“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Seth considered the first two questions but not the third one; I didn’t realize this until the session was over. We were visited by Sheri, Jerry, and Roni at 8:33 PM this evening; they stayed an hour or so, hence the late start for this evening’s session. Sheri called at 8 PM, having just arrived at the Bankers’ from NYC. She wanted to tell us about class in NYC, etc. Although we wanted to see her, we found ourselves caught in the old dilemma about visitors conflicting with plans we’d already made— i.e., the session tonight. Half our problem, we saw in a discussion before the guests arrived, was that we had no planned response for such situations: we ended up feeling guilty at saying no, and resentful at saying yes. As it was, we sat for the session, with a resolve to try to do better next time. We do make progress in such affairs as visitors, expected or not expected, but could do much better.

Such measures to some extent segregate certain portions of the body, as if those portions could be considered alone. In Ruburt’s case the bifocals would have been detrimental. His vision problems had little to do with his eyes, for example, but with the way he was using the ligaments in his neck, and with his posture. As the posture changed, the eyes had to change. Those changes were bound to involve alterations in vision.