“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Now. There is, as you know, a breakthrough in your work. The rest will flow from that. You both thought in terms of problems when you considered money, for example; you thought of the problems involved.

You have shown an important breakthrough in your work. Your brushes were straight and in good condition. Ruburt’s will allow him to make his breakthrough. You must see how the problem acclimated responses leading to not moving, etc., on both your parts and continued Ruburt’s condition. You focused, both of you, upon the problem.

Now. You are tired. The analogy was a simple one. You painted a picture, showed great improvement in so doing, but you did not start out with crooked brushes. They were in excellent condition. Ruburt is trying to paint a new physical picture of his body from himself. In the analogy he does not start with your perfect brushes however, but with limbs not straight. His tools had to be adjusted first before he can make the same breakthrough, yet it is just as certain. I thought it was clear.