“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Consider again, for the sake of analogy, the Sumari language as compared to impressionism. At its best (underlined) impressionism achieved a certain focus unknown to Western art up to that time, in your terms, offering a breakthrough from cohesive objective form into the moving vitality that gives objects, say, their durability and shapes their images.

Using the art form, the artist in a strange way broke through line, destroyed what would seem to be the literal continuity of the objective shape. At the same time a few lines were used to hint at a variety of unseen, apparently unstructured objects, so that in that regard the line became in the hands of a master a strong symbol, hinting at other realities that lay within the seemingly distorted portrayal of objects.

They throw their particular light upon the reality that you perceive, as for example you name objects. Alphabets are nevertheless tools that shape and direct perception. They are groups of relationships that are then transposed upon (in quotes) “reality.” To this extent they shape your conceptions of the world that you know.