“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

It was montella. (My phonetic interpretation.) Montellas are the end products of cordellas, arranged not only in a certain fashion, but congregated or placed within a certain rich sphere of dyniad activity.

The word dyniah connotes an apparent boundary that serves to define that which lies within by acting upon it. dyniah, the word itself without the “d” ending, you see, while never appearing within the montella, defines its activity, reinforces its identity, and is as much a part of it as the hidden cordella that gives it form. (Pause.) From the outside the dyniah seems to bring the montella to an end. (Long pause.) Give us a moment here.

As you know, there is constant interaction going on within all portions of the montella, these possible because of the defining boundary (in quotes) “barrier.”

I am using the different terms simply to give you an idea of how the language can be used to free your ideas about familiar things. The most (in quotes) “objective” montella is a symbol of course. The more true to life the montella is the less apt you are to realize its symbolic qualities on a conscious level.

Now our sessions have always involved methods of perception, and the translation of inner experience. The sessions themselves deal with experiences that are basically not verbal but must be physically translated. Translations go on of which you are not aware whether or not you perceive them, and whether or not you are affected. They are simply the results of such activity intruding into a physical montella.

If new ambrya—think of embryo now—(in parentheses now:) data were to be inserted into a painting, a completed painting, from the inside, then all the relationships within the painting would change. If new ambrya is inserted into a physical montella then all the relationships within it must change. (Pause.)