1 result for (book:tps2 AND heading:"delet session octob 13 1972" AND stemmed:seth)
10/60 (17%)
Timothy
Foote
Seagull
Bach
Claus
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(As it was, Seth spoke very briefly to Timothy Foote at about 3:00 PM, discussing some remarks all of us had been making about Freudian psychology. It wasn’t recorded or noted. At the time I thought the brief appearance a little odd, but when it developed that Timothy Foote wouldn’t be staying for supper, as we had planned, Seth’s appearance made good sense.
(Some time later Jane told me she picked up that when Seth spoke Timothy was suspicious—“Seth would speak now, you see, in order to make an impression,” etc.
(Timothy Foote told Jane he would review Seth Speaks for the magazine. We didn’t ask him to do this. He told us his review for Richard Bach wouldn’t “be hostile;” he didn’t particularly like the book. Jane, liking Timothy Foote, told me later that had he stayed for the evening she would have had a session for him; yet we feel there were reasons he didn’t stay, and that things worked out for the best all around.
(We did not expect a session this evening. While Jane and I discussed the events of the day, however, she said Seth was around, and that we could have a session if we so chose. The following data tells in the main what the three of us talked about today. The session was held in Jane’s workroom.)
[... 23 paragraphs ...]
(We were interrupted by the phone ringing at 9:20. It was Tom Hartley, trying to get in touch with Peg Gallagher. Both work for the Elmira Star-Gazette. After the call I read Seth’s last sentence to Jane. Seth then finished it:)
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
(Timothy told Jane that his 16-year-old daughter voiced two questions for Seth: “Is there a God? Does He know what’s going on down here?” We hope we recalled them accurately.)
[... 10 paragraphs ...]
(“Thank you very much, Seth. That was very nice.”)
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(9:42. Actually, Seth’s humorous reference to Jane marked the end of the rather short session.
(A copy of Seth’s answer to Timothy’s daughter will be sent to Timothy, probably after his article about Dick Bach has appeared in Time Magazine. [Copy sent to Timothy Foote October 21, Saturday.]
(Added Note: Timothy Foote also told Jane and me that he’d like to do a feature story on Jane, Seth and me for Time Magazine, but that it probably wouldn’t ever be done—the magazine being “too secular”—Timothy Foote’s words. I don’t know whether he meant cover story, a la Dick Bach.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]