1 result for (book:tps2 AND heading:"delet session june 14 1972" AND stemmed:"seth materi")
[... 12 paragraphs ...]
(9:40.) Give us time.... The delivery of the material per se in our sessions, now, does not basically bother him. He is afraid of making people lose their faith. It was considered the sin of sins. He felt deeply betrayed particularly by Father Doran, and resolved never to betray others in such a way.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
One letter from someone who wrote saying that The Seth Material contributed to a nervous breakdown is a case in point.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
He also knows that such channels lead other people away from, specifically, the Catholic church. He wondered if what he can give can make up for what they might lose. Before the material was public this bothered him, but not to that degree. It worried him when people seem to turn to the material in the same way that they might turn to a church, merely substituting one set of ideas for another, while never experiencing the concepts themselves.
The material you received from him was quite correct. At another level he feared that his relationship with me was the result of unconscious fraud, and trickery, that he had indeed become the false prophet, and conned you and everyone else, including himself.
This was because he had for one thing watched what he thought of as the two faces of Father Doran, who conned others in his preaching then showed quite opposing characteristics afterward. The quality of the material itself often kept him from admitting this feeling. The experience at the writer’s convention also had an affect there, plus the young psychologist’s remarks later—all of this accepted because of the inferiority feelings of childhood.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
Some of my material is difficult to accept intuitively and intellectually at one time. You may intuitively grasp a point and intellectually not understand it, or the other way around. But Ruburt insists that he intellectually and intuitively understand each point, and agree with it, or it puts him in the position of publicizing ideas when he is not a hundred percent certain of their validity, and he considers this to some degree dishonest. If he is wrong and people follow him, where is he leading them?
So sometimes you see in such periods he will put off sessions. The three Christs material particularly affects him that way, for to deny the conventional idea of Christ is to antagonize not merely Catholicism but basic Christian belief. The same material presented fictionally would not bother him at all. He stands behind the idea, you see. He is afraid of being attacked, or he is afraid of the work being attacked, for that kind of reason, as his poetry was.
[... 20 paragraphs ...]
(Good night, Seth.”
(11:27. I don’t think Seth fully answered the question I asked above on the previous page, but I chose not to press the point at this time.)