1 result for (book:tps2 AND heading:"delet session decemb 13 1972" AND stemmed:issu)

TPS2 Deleted Session December 13, 1972 8/86 (9%) move resentment dwelling money tenants
– The Personal Sessions: Book 2 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session December 13, 1972 9:39 PM Wednesday

[... 19 paragraphs ...]

The two apartments helped, but in a way there is less privacy because of the public hall, you see. You have used your dwelling place as a symbol then, which is why it becomes important. Otherwise it would not be an issue. Ruburt has strongly held down any tendencies through the years to spend any money, small as it might be, in decorating, buying furniture, simply because of your joint attitudes, the feeling of transition.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

He feels that you should have also, or you should have been satisfied with your work, regardless, one way or the other. So the issue is highly charged whenever you discuss it, and on the few occasions when you have looked around.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

Without understanding however you can simply project all the problems. In your case a move would have such drastic connotations, and be so symbolic, that its beneficial nature is assured. Your not moving symbolically represents your not doing many things—your not facing many issues.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

In your present dwelling there are many obvious issues. The two tiny kitchens show clearly that the nourishment of food has been given the last spot, in both of your lives. Ruburt simply carried it to the extreme, but the inclination is obvious in your dwelling.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

Now all of these issues made him more and more susceptible to certain influences that were in the house. The influences were not dangerous unless you were in the mental mood to be affected by them.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

Some of the small, seemingly silly issues forever put off: a private backyard, shielding trees outside, a front and back door of your own, for Ruburt a dog, both of you a unit of your own; that is, a house over which you had control.

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

It seemed to him that you were always going to leave your job one day and paint, but that day never came and the two of you were going to move one day, but that day never came, so he forced the one issue. In Florida he thought seriously of living there to make a move, but nothing came of it. Your discussion this evening at the table about finances led him deeper into those feelings he tries so hard to avoid. Here he was doing better than ever, with more money in the offing, and to what purpose? Nothing would ever change. He could not keep up financially, much less think of moving, so put it ahead in the future again.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Now. Neither of you were ready to make such a physical change. Financially he could have, as you can now, but you were not willing to face the issues beneath. You would have moved out of resentment, feeling forced to, and not out of understanding.

[... 18 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TPS1 Session 533 (Deleted Portion) June 1, 1970 land gardening dwelling ambiguous purchase
TES9 Session 485 June 2, 1969 rent landlady raised Leonard resentment
TES1 Session 40 April 1, 1964 spider capsule plane desk web
NotP Chapter 7: Session 780, June 22, 1976 language implies psyche identity Cézanne