was

1 result for (book:tps2 AND heading:"delet session august 27 1973" AND stemmed:was)

TPS2 Deleted Session August 27, 1973 10/56 (18%) kiss redecorating hug spontaneity love
– The Personal Sessions: Book 2 of The Deleted Seth Material
– © 2016 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Deleted Session August 27, 1973 9:00 PM Monday

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

(The phone rang at 9:10. It was Eleanor Friede. She and Jane talked until about 10:10.)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

He was so direct emotionally that he idealized what he thought of as your relative detachment. This of course is old. At one time he felt his emotional spontaneity was indeed admired by you and encouraged, and he blossomed. Then he felt it threatened you—that it would form a barrier between you. He felt that you thought he wanted more than you could give—or wanted to give, practically speaking.

He believed that emotional freedom would be construed as chaos, that while you said be spontaneous, you meant “Be spontaneous when it is convenient.” Beside the personality differences, however, work was also involved. Spontaneous love-making for example would cut into the work schedule that both of you had evolved.

All of this is old, yet the patterns began strongly then. He felt that his obvious femininity was almost a threat to both of your works, that he had no right to look sexy and tempt you both when spontaneous love play, for example, would not occur. He remembers you telling him not to kiss you or be sexually provocative unless he meant it.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

He felt it unfair to keep at you for emotional expression of love through verbalization and touch when it was not natural to you. In self-protection he tried to become the same way, to inhibit his sexuality because of what he thought of as your temperamental differences, and also because of the work schedule interruptions.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

These feelings were also based upon youthful feelings, that a woman’s biology could be a threat to a writer, so there was a base there that made a certain sense to Ruburt.

Lately he was convinced that he was unattractive to you from the face down, that you considered him stupid, as he did, while having physical difficulty; that you were a perfectionist and did not want to see crooked legs—that physically, not mentally, he got in your way, and that physically you did not look upon him with approval, as he did not.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(10:37. Among other things, Jane wrote later: “I thought Rob was saying—when you’re completely recovered, etc we’ll take trips. Symbolism: When you’re good enough.” 10:52.)

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

To him it was a direct action taken against something that annoyed him—the dust—an act of independence since he did it, and a symbolic clearing away of inner debris. To completely redecorate and rearrange your apartment would represent a symbolic and literal statement. At least you would be perfecting what you have, and taking steps within that framework, freely redecorating creatively, changing your environment instead of squawking while staying. Yet he is sure you would consider it a vast annoying distraction, even though not as annoying as moving. But he has not felt free to go ahead in either direction.

[... 20 paragraphs ...]

Now. I want Ruburt to keep a pendulum by the bed. In the morning suggestions given with the pendulum, and both of you participating. He is not to feel ashamed of his body in your eyes, regardless of its condition. Again, in one night I can only give you so much, but he grew afraid, and you helped him today to combat that fear: He was frightened that the body could not change, and your belief that it could was of great help.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

NotP Chapter 5: Session 773, April 26, 1976 sexual sex devotion Church expression
ECS4 ESP Class Session, May 25, 1971 Ron Brady evil pope Theodore
TPS2 Session 647 (Deleted Portion) March 12, 1973 freedom chores varieties impediments lack
TES2 Session 77 August 5, 1964 congenial sensuous vacation compensate psychic