1 result for (book:tps1 AND session:385 AND stemmed:he)
27/48 (56%)
committed
deceit
poetic
Cron
Le
Displaying only most relevant fragments—original results reproduced too much of the copyrighted work.
He did not want to use his work (pause) to place his work, at the service of a cause to which he was not indelibly committed. (Long pause, eyes closed.) He has always been concerned with teaching, as I have been. [...] He must believe completely in what he is doing, in what he is teaching, or he feels himself deceitful.
He is strongly accusing toward anything he regards as religious deceit, because of his experience you see, with several priests in the past. [...] He is deeply committed to his idea of truth and goodness. When he could no longer believe in the tenets of the Catholic Church wholeheartedly, fervently and completely, he divorced himself from it as thoroughly as he had once embraced its tenets.
[...] He denied himself its use to anything like full capacity, for reasons given earlier, and also because he refused to use it rather than misuse it. He had to be more certain of our cause before he would allow himself to direct energy into it.
Ruburt does not mistrust himself because he plunges headlong, literally, into the poetic experience. He does not feel guilty because he does not intellectually question the moment of poetic revelation. He should therefore allow himself to plunge headlong with the same commitment into this experience.
[...] He is committed to you for example, in this way. He is being overly cautious, realizing the strength of his commitments. He makes few of them. [...]
A definite strain therefore developed, particularly painful since it involved his work also, to which he has always been strongly committed. He recognized the value of our endeavors to his work. On the other hand he still was not completely (underlined) committed, and therefore mistrusted.
Even if he takes a conscious neutral stand, this will be of great benefit, for as he overreacts, he overreacts to his own doubts. [...]
In any case he must realize that no fraud is involved. He is not lying, as the child is accused of doing when he describes something his parents consider outlandish.
He is involved in a search for truth, and he must be prepared to follow wherever the search leads him. [...] He must realize this. [...]
[...] He would like to isolate me and observe me. When he allows himself more freedom,he will be able to sense me in definite terms, though as a rule not during a session.
