but

1 result for (book:tma AND heading:"session nine septemb 8 1980" AND stemmed:but)

TMA Session Nine September 8, 1980 8/32 (25%) stomach Hall Prentice logic medical
– The Magical Approach
– © 2011 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session Nine: The Body’s Reasoning as Logic. Belief Systems
– Session Nine September 8, 1980 8:43 P.M., Monday

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(She’s also been quite restless in bed at night. When she wakes up she does exercises sometimes. I suggested she get up, but the exercises seem to substitute for the physical activity that getting up would entail.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

There has been one rather remarkable improvement in Ruburt’s performance: getting to his feet. That is the result of the body’s magical reasoning — for the body reasons so quickly, so clearly and concisely (pause), that its deductions, its logic, are far too fast for the intellect to follow. The body reasons directly. The body’s reasoning transforms itself into action, with nothing to stand between its elegant logic and the (pause) logic’s brilliant execution. Ruburt could not possibly follow all of the manipulations necessary so that the recent improvements could take place. Again, bodily efforts are as magical, as creative, certainly, as the writing of a book or a poem (intently)but Ruburt in the past trusted his creative abilities as if they were something he had to guard from his physical self.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(8:59.) You both believed it was quite possible to have clairvoyant dreams, out-of-body experiences, creative adventures in the arts — but to some extent both of you doubted that the same power or energy could be directed effectively in the physical realm, so-called, of bodily health, or situations of the nitty-gritty (with emphatic amusement). Again, the material is indeed dealing with a far more valid explanation for the working ways of reality than the old official beliefs — and again, we are not just (underlined) dealing with evocative, creative hypotheses.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

If our ideas were already accepted in the world, there would be no need for our work. Prentice-Hall is, of course, well-intentioned, and under their belief system it is nearly sacrilegious to be anything more than officially disapproving of medical matters. That is, some disapproval is acceptable. To attack medical corruption, or medical errors, or particular clinics, for example, is within bounds, but to attack the belief system of the entire structure is something else again.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(Softly amused:) As a matter of fact — in case you may think sometimes that I am not fully aware of your mores — I did indeed temper many of my remarks in Mass Events on several subjects, so that the book would not be found too objectionable in the context of your times. The implications are there, but your belief systems must be allowed to mellow and change in the light of new knowledge, rather than to be booted aside with an angry foot.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(9:18 P.M. “I come out, and look at my eyes,” Jane said half humorously. True, her eyes were relaxed into slits — although they gradually opened normally as we talked. “I’m glad I did that,” she said, meaning that she’d held the session, “but I really didn’t know whether I could. …”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(“I was so aware of my body today,” she commented, “that I wondered if I’d be aware of it during the session, but all I remember is drinking wine — which is the kind of thing I usually remember.”

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

My present uncomfortable state isn’t drastic, by any means, but it is getting my attention — which, after all, is the reason I’m creating it to begin with. Maybe I’d be better off, I told Jane, if I’d just blow my top. Only who, or what, would I direct my frustration to, or at? On the one hand Jane, Seth, and I want to see our work presented to the world as originally conceived, as a way to offer ideas to think about. On the other hand, I can visualize the dilemma those at the publisher’s feel when they’re being asked to print ideas that are, at least in part, so contrary to accepted belief structures in a very important field.…

Similar sessions

TMA Session Twelve September 22, 1980 disclaimer Parker textbooks Prentice intellect
TPS6 Deleted Session June 11, 1981 Tam Prentice editors competent taxes
TPS5 Deleted Session November 19, 1980 disclaimer legal processes department hips
TPS3 Session 765 (Deleted Portion) February 2, 1976 disclosure photographs stomach album perfection