but

1 result for (book:tma AND heading:"appendix d" AND stemmed:but)

TMA Appendix D 4/15 (27%) Laurel metaphysics skepticism Magical science
– The Magical Approach
– © 2011 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Appendix D: Jane’s Challenges with Her Scope of Identity vs. the Scientific Community

As her psychic abilities began to rapidly grow, following her initiation of the Seth material late in 1963, Jane couldn’t help but become more and more concerned about consciously enlarging her “scope of identity.” It became obvious to us later, of course, that even her first doubts and questions about things psychic made it inevitable that she would confront such a basic issue. As was characteristic of us, also, we worked by ourselves for a long time as we attempted to learn more about what we were doing. But naive creatures that we were, when we did begin to reach out we were quite unprepared for the skepticism we would meet from the learned “establishment.” In large part, that rejection was to continue. Very understandable, then, that Jane, both for herself and for Seth, would write so eloquently about the disparity between her psychic abilities and “the currently scientifically-oriented blend of rationalism,” as Seth describes that quality earlier in this Session Six for The Magical Approach.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

Jane Roberts and Robert Butts have had letters from scientists of all kinds, many of them academics. In some ways the Seth material has been given credit by the establishment; being taught as university course work, for example. But often readers have been afraid to admit publicly that they have found truth in metaphysical sources. They have been trapped by the boundaries of what science has so far accepted into its family: an ethnocentrically perfect “set” of beliefs, with metaphysical mysteries denied, avoided, or written out.

So far, metaphysics has only been entertainment, a step-science of our culture; part of the extended family of science for the purposes of inspiration and ideas, but not given credit as scientific truth. Frowned upon. Even feared.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The Magical Approach is a perfect example of a scientifically-unacceptable method of working with reality. Yet, The Magical Approach works. I can state that with amazement from my own experience. At first it may not seem to be giving you the results you expect, but you are working within spacious time. Your schedule may have to change. You may start bringing in different experiences than you think you are seeking, then materialize your original requirements later on. Your wish-focus disappears into Frameworks 2, 3, and 4,1 and then reappears later. Natural magic: This process can bring you more complex ideas and proof than you conceived of.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TMA Session Five August 20, 1980 George Laurel target magical rational
TMA Foreword by Robert F. Butts Laurel publishing Amber Allen Library
TPS6 Deleted Session December 3, 1981 therapeutic program trigger regardless uniform
TMA Session Four August 18, 1980 Gus glass magical assumptions door