1 result for (book:tes9 AND session:467 AND stemmed:would)
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
This will allow for regularity, and also provide for some release from regularity. This does not mean that a session may not be missed now and then. It does mean that variety would be allowed for within our framework.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
In a very literal manner then you are the knowledge that you have. The interchange is constant. Now. Initially and basically perception is not dependent upon your senses. Any perception is first of all a psychic one that is then translated in ways meaningful to the physical organism. To other organisms in different realities perception would therefore be translated in an entirely different manner.
Relying upon such external perceptions therefore, communication between members of various systems would be relatively impossible. You might not perceive each other to begin with, or realize that there is anything to be perceived. Such contact therefore would always take place beneath so-called normal perception, and even then you would have to translate this inner perception, as you do any into terms you could understand as physical creatures.
That translation would be bound to be distortive, and yet it would be the only kind of perception or understanding that would be possible under the circumstances.
Now to some (underlined) degree, this also applies to the information that I give you in our sessions. It must come through the available channels of the physical human mechanism in order that it be at all meaningful. As I mentioned some sessions ago, on the one hand you can say that the method involves distortion, but without the distortions there would be no meaningful knowledge for you to understand.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
As you for example attempt to blend colors to give an effect, they telepathically send out a continual stream of ever-changing colors. Such a concept as a sentence would be meaningless to them, and yet pattern is involved in the colors so that the shape and form of a color also has meaning.
The analogy may be a poor one in that it says so little, and yet it will be helpful in giving you the idea. Instead of nouns for example you would have the shape of the ever-moving pattern, instead of a verb the pulsation of the color, or rather of its transmission. Instead of a time sequence of tenses, which they would not need, you have the intensities and depths of color.
These are not to be thought of as colored pictures however, for neither do they use that kind of imagery, and yet a high degree of preciseness is communicated. In your terms there would be, in quotes, “words” for all kinds of subtle emotional states for which you have no words.
Now were I to communicate with someone in that system, I would have to affect their sense mechanisms, and therefore the material would be delivered in a way, again, that would seem to distort it, and yet without the method it could not be given.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(9:39. Jane left trance easily. She remembered parts of the material. Seth was pushing data at her, she said. She had no idea before the session as to what Seth would discuss; nor had she been reading about any such ideas as those presented tonight before the session.
[... 10 paragraphs ...]
Emotional reasoning however rises far above this. The inner highly precise nature of the in quotes “emotional intellect” is hidden from you, for the physical intellect cannot follow it. The emotional intellect therefore would seem chaotic. Most of its richness and depth would not be perceived by the physically oriented brain.
[... 15 paragraphs ...]