“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Doubles have no meaning in the Planck thing, whatever that is. The weaker integer doubles its (value) with the speed of light. Better put value in parentheses, because I’m not sure it’s the right word.

The positions of the values above and below ... the line is then reversed. (Pause.)

The order of value descends in direct proportion (Jane’s tone was very puzzled, eyes open), to the order of ascension on the positive side. (Then she added: ) This is to make that clearer; talking about negative and positive values, and on the negative side the value descends in direct proportion to the order of ascension on the positive side.

This instability isn’t noticeable here, even after the 9th power, but it exists. The unpredictability seems to result in the dissolution of quadrants under certain conditions. The value of the integers would seem to dissolve (pause) at the speed of light, but it is precisely here that the minus numbers take over and become, or take on, the value of the positive numbers.

If you consider the positive and negative numbers like a spectrum, then, the spectrum shifts. The inner values of the minus numbers have not been, I think, suspected.

The value of the integers thrusts forward and back, pulsating like reflection (pause) that draws (quadrants or integers) (better put those terms in parenthesis, Jane said, since she wasn’t sure of the word to use) like a magnet, adding their value to their own. (Pause.)

At a certain point the integers seem to dissolve; their value undermined (“I think this bit has to do with that Planck thing,” Jane said), but here they actually pick up added powers, precisely where you cannot follow, in integer, where its values seem to be undermined. At this point it is raised to another power that escapes the perceptive abilities of the 3-dimensional brain.

(Long pause. Again Jane said: “Don’t write anything yet, I’m not sure of what I’m getting,” while I wrote it anyhow:) I’m getting the impression of a little man with dark hair, and he seems very far away, so I think he’s in the past; and he has old-fashioned clothes on... a watch chain and a vest... connected with a college, a prestige one like Princeton or Yale; and he worked on mathematical theories, and he suspected, oddly enough, that some integers or numbers had unsuspected values, and he was right.

Now, with him the date 1936. And unless I’m balled up I think 1936 is the year he published or initiated some of his theories. Correctly interpreted, they would lead as mentioned earlier to an unsuspected unpredictability of integers under certain conditions, and the unpredictability is the clue that would lead to the thus-far hidden values. (Pause.)

The beauty of the zero is precisely that all other values in it lie inherent. Now it can gobble up all your (parentheses here, I’m not sure:) integers; and those dissolving values mentioned earlier, dissolving into zero gain new power.

At the 9th power certain values begin to slip away. What is wrong, that you have not missed them? The quadrants involved turn into a spiral, turn the zero inside out. Within its magnitude even the lowly integrity of 4 vanishes.

You force stability upon them, but you cannot predict their action (puzzled again), when you cross them (pause), in the nature of a pi. The first formula is overloaded to the right. The negative values about it will supersede and gobble the integrity of 3; unload the 7. Greek (Jane paused and sat with her head cocked as though listening), and the theorems of (“I’m having trouble with the name.”) Minopeles (my phonetic interpretation), a minor mathematician.

The constant cannot be counted upon in the equation as written. Your values undermine themselves. You forget the integrity of 7.

Here the equation (voice pitched higher) seeks to turn inside out, but the functions and values of the integers return it to stability. The functions at times are completely reversed, but the overall integrity of the equation stands. Nature without its clothes on, ha, ha, ha. (Voice drops to normal). Or the alchemists out- did themselves.

There is a basic unpredictability. Find it. Grouped generally under the values of the simple 7, plus and minus the magnitude of the 7 as it goes through the zero, brings you a multidimensional concept that equates with truth.

The definite magnification, and outward from each number in pyramid form, the angle, unformulated functions. The true edification of the mathematician is to sense the values of the numbers’ move. The interaction accumulates. The effects build up, and are therefore demonstrable after psi makes its appearance known. Turn about the integers but there is no disorder, yet the precise neatness of the integers is based not upon basic order, but ordered chaos, that once in a millionfold escape of the integer from its bounds.

(Steady, rather fast pace.) Known values operate up to a point, then the unpredictable nature of the psi factor undermines accepted tenets, and the equation seems to fail. Group your forces under the protection of the 9th power.

Here the great army of the integers vanishes into the mouths of the quadrants, and the destruction of the previous functions of the integers is accomplished. But the previous functions, dissolving, do so only to re-emerge in a new fashion, and up rise the values of the 12th powers, now under the triumphant banners of the psi factor, minus 7 over an unfolded pi. Regrouped, the values assault each other.

X has lost its strength and Y is under the siege of Planck. Planck’s forces (pause), triumph over the old values but zero gobbles some of Planck’s men, the integer minus 7, and to work out, psi must be confused for a moment with 8. The mistake is found, and Y is free. Too bad you neglected the psi factor. You thought 7 gobbled it up. 371 will not stand alone in that location. It is besieged by truth to the 3rd power, truth being one, hand in hand with 7. Three C (E?), 3C, over 9 to the 7th power, will temporarily equate with 9 over 137, might give you truth.