“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Needless to say, neither Jane or I know math; I may know a little more than Jane, but I couldn’t explain an integer to her at break this evening, for instance. A few phrases that came through in the data had a familiar ring to me, but Jane said they meant nothing to her.

(Jane’s impressions are in Roman type, like Seth’s. While giving the data she was able to speak to me and describe her subjective state also, without breaking the thread of her reception.

(Jane then told me to wait, that when she got something it was “real clear,” but that she didn’t know where it was coming from. I said she could wait and let Seth deal with the data, and she rejoined that she didn’t want to interrupt what she was getting. At times she spoke in a hesitant voice, at other times very rapidly, and usually with a puzzled expression; eyes open often, as usual in her trance states.)

The—I don’t know what you call these ... (When I said I didn’t know how to write down what she was telling me, Jane said:)Just put: the minus numbers represent negative charges, and mark the activity of ions’ negative flow. The minus numbers mask integers that have a positive meaning or action (pause), and take on the tasks ordinarily assigned in this dimension to the positive ones.

(For some reason Jane then told me I didn’t have to put this down, but I did so anyway: ) The order of the integers on the negative side descends in direct proportion to the order of ascension of integers on the positive side. But the balance between them, the two systems, is only apparent from your particular viewpoint, and not basic.

(At 9: 43 Jane paused and seemingly left trance. “I’m just waiting a minute,” she said. “When it stops, I stop, see. This doesn’t make any sense to me—I’m probably distorting the whole thing. Now I seem to be getting:

The significance of the quadrants has never been clearly understood—there are powers working on the numbers beyond those that you know. (Fast pace.) The unrelated functions bear strong relation (Jane asked me to read this phrase back), to the underlying principles upon which the basic theories of malfunction are formed. Malfunction being the inability of a number in a particular equation to perform its usual service.