“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(She then said:) An infinity has no number. The other side of zero cannot be reversed. (Pause.) Freedom to the 9th power.

The minus principle can be multiplied forever. There is no constant. Herein is the fallacy. (Pause.) The answer then to one of your questions lies here.

The positions of the values above and below ... the line is then reversed. (Pause.)

The—I don’t know what you call these ... (When I said I didn’t know how to write down what she was telling me, Jane said:)Just put: the minus numbers represent negative charges, and mark the activity of ions’ negative flow. The minus numbers mask integers that have a positive meaning or action (pause), and take on the tasks ordinarily assigned in this dimension to the positive ones.

There is an instability and still unpredictable activity inherent in the integers (pause), but shows more strongly, or appears, after the 9th power.

This instability isn’t noticeable here, even after the 9th power, but it exists. The unpredictability seems to result in the dissolution of quadrants under certain conditions. The value of the integers would seem to dissolve (pause) at the speed of light, but it is precisely here that the minus numbers take over and become, or take on, the value of the positive numbers.

The value of the integers thrusts forward and back, pulsating like reflection (pause) that draws (quadrants or integers) (better put those terms in parenthesis, Jane said, since she wasn’t sure of the word to use) like a magnet, adding their value to their own. (Pause.)

(At 9: 43 Jane paused and seemingly left trance. “I’m just waiting a minute,” she said. “When it stops, I stop, see. This doesn’t make any sense to me—I’m probably distorting the whole thing. Now I seem to be getting:

(Resume:) X Y I’m not sure, either to the 2nd or 9th power, that goes next to Y over a line; pi, and (pause) one of those marks between, an equal mark I think (Jane was now trying to draw marks in the air), C C something that looks like an H over a line, 4. This is a multidimensional game. Have fun.

(We hoped that after this rest Seth would come through and explain what was going on, but instead Jane resumed as before. She spoke in her own voice, rapidly and slowly by turn, eyes open often and with many a pause and puzzled expression. Resume at 10:00.)

(Long pause. Again Jane said: “Don’t write anything yet, I’m not sure of what I’m getting,” while I wrote it anyhow:) I’m getting the impression of a little man with dark hair, and he seems very far away, so I think he’s in the past; and he has old-fashioned clothes on... a watch chain and a vest... connected with a college, a prestige one like Princeton or Yale; and he worked on mathematical theories, and he suspected, oddly enough, that some integers or numbers had unsuspected values, and he was right.

Now, with him the date 1936. And unless I’m balled up I think 1936 is the year he published or initiated some of his theories. Correctly interpreted, they would lead as mentioned earlier to an unsuspected unpredictability of integers under certain conditions, and the unpredictability is the clue that would lead to the thus-far hidden values. (Pause.)

It is as if infinity doubled in upon itself. Zero (gesture, a frown, a pause), being far from neuter, but a gateway through which the integrity of the other numbers come. The integrity of zero cannot be doubted.

Within the 9th to the 11th power is the answer to the riddle. (Pause.) No integer is the same from one moment to the next. (Puzzled, Jane shook her head.)

You force stability upon them, but you cannot predict their action (puzzled again), when you cross them (pause), in the nature of a pi. The first formula is overloaded to the right. The negative values about it will supersede and gobble the integrity of 3; unload the 7. Greek (Jane paused and sat with her head cocked as though listening), and the theorems of (“I’m having trouble with the name.”) Minopeles (my phonetic interpretation), a minor mathematician.

(Pause at 10:28... “I’m just waiting,” Jane said. She looked at Roger’s formulas again briefly. “I don’t know what I’m looking at.” She did have the feeling of the little man, as though she looked at him in a small box, she said. She interpreted this to mean she saw him in the past.

Malfunctioning numbers appear in pairs mainly at the 3rd, 9th and 11th powers. (Pause.) They are a sign of the instability of the P S I (psi spelled out), factor, and mitigate against the validity of your results.

To offset this, regard again (puzzled expression), the full nature of your integers and remember their relation to the factor known as p. Underscoring this is the problem of cohesives. The unifying nature (pause) underlying the principle of P S I (spelled) group together in a conciliatory fashion. You will find that marvelous aptitude (pause), of the psi factor beneath. The seemingly erratic nature(s) of the integers then join. The beauty of it lies precisely in the fashion that the merging numbers (integers) meet. (Jane said to put the word integers in parentheses, since she wasn’t sure of what word to use there.)

(Pause. I had questioned Jane to see that I had the right word, wedging, above.)

X has lost its strength and Y is under the siege of Planck. Planck’s forces (pause), triumph over the old values but zero gobbles some of Planck’s men, the integer minus 7, and to work out, psi must be confused for a moment with 8. The mistake is found, and Y is free. Too bad you neglected the psi factor. You thought 7 gobbled it up. 371 will not stand alone in that location. It is besieged by truth to the 3rd power, truth being one, hand in hand with 7. Three C (E?), 3C, over 9 to the 7th power, will temporarily equate with 9 over 137, might give you truth.