“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Some of these are perceived and experienced as definite events within your own system. It is you who choose among the probabilities, and from these you form the given collection that compose any particular event.

“Outside” in quotes of the realities of which I am aware and others are aware, there are systems that we cannot describe. They are massive energy sources, (pause), cosmic energy banks, who make possible the whole reality of probabilities.

We are moving in that direction. Portions of the entity in quotes “arrive” before other portions, and send us communications that we can hardly understand. The other personality who speaks is on the edge of such a system. (Long pause.) The other system is the inside of the inside. It has seen the birth and death of many physical universes such as your own; and the entities within it, in quotes, “at one time” were the inhabitants of such universes. (Long pause.)

Most of these probable systems, returning to our earlier discussion, are open. You simply do not realize that this is the case.

In your system it seems as if you have chosen one course, one main line of probabilities, and that is the end of it. On other existences however you choose other probabilities. Now your own system is relatively (underlined) closed, in that within it as a rule only one ego predominates, and you think of yourself as that ego.

In other systems this is not necessarily the case. The time system within them is entirely different than your own. In these the inner self is aware of itself as more than one ego. (Pause.) The inner self can play more than one role at once, consciously in other words. Simply as an analogy, it would be as if within physical reality you lived, say, the life of a rich man of great talent, the life of a poor man with entirely different talents, and the life of a mother and career woman. You would be aware of yourself in each of these three roles, and find qualities being developed in each of the separate lives.

Again this is an analogy, for in several respects it could lead you astray if you took it too literally. In such a system there would be no breakup of time for example, since time does not exist in the same manner.