1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:310 AND stemmed:draw)

TES7 Session 310 January 9, 1967 5/101 (5%) Keck Caroline Pomerantz Louis Brooklyn
– The Early Sessions: Book 7 of The Seth Material
– © 2014 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 310 January 9, 1967 9 PM Monday

[... 55 paragraphs ...]

(Caroline Keck sent Jane the items to give to her in appreciation for a pen and ink drawing of a pigeon I gave to Caroline Keck. In July 1964 Jane worked at the Arnot Art Gallery, and Caroline Keck and her husband Sheldon spent some time there then, putting the gallery’s collection in shape. Jane liked Caroline Keck, and the two got along well. The drawing of the pigeon was among a group I had exhibited at the gallery at the time the Kecks were present; they saw it and admired it. I never met the Kecks, but told Jane to give the drawing to them.

[... 31 paragraphs ...]

(“Connection with a man also. With you and another man," Some distortion develops here, but we think this legitimate data. See the copy of the object on page 230. Note that Caroline Keck writes Jane that her son Larry appropriated my drawing for his own use. Jane looked at me when she gave this data, incidentally.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(4th Question: Who is the other man referred to besides myself? “Something to do with an animal in a tree, that I do not understand.” I had been hoping Seth, or Jane, might come up with Caroline Keck’s husband, Sheldon, or her son Larry, who is named on the object itself. See page 230. Of course I was involved with another man, and this involvement Seth picked up—since my drawing was appropriated by Larry Keck, as noted on the object.

(This in turn leads Seth to some excellent data which is also amusing. The drawing I gave the Kecks was of a pigeon—the “animal in a tree.” The drawing merely showed a pigeon, no tree, and a pigeon is not an animal. Yet the data is very good.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(5th Question: Initials? “This may be your friend Gallagher, or your friend Mark, for the first name would seem to be William.” A miss here. As far as we know, neither Bill Gallagher or Bill Macdonnel (Mark) are involved with the object. Bill Macdonnel may have seen the pigeon drawing when it was on exhibit at the gallery; I do not know for sure. Could William have come from Larry, on the object?

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES7 February 2, 1967 Dream: Third Sequence Untermeyer girl poetry brown til
TES3 Session 143 April 5, 1965 illness visitors Sonja pills Louis
TPS4 Deleted Session August 27, 1977 tooth Arizona Inn teeth fallen
TES7 Session 313 January 18, 1967 John company caucus m.j Chicago