“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

You do not perceive them physically. The direction of focus for them has changed. In the case of probable realities the focus of energy has always been different from your own. It is quite possible, as you should know, under certain circumstances, to contact survival personalities. It is highly difficult however for you to contact your own probable personalities.

These probable realities exist within what may be generally termed your own sphere of activity, your own plane. There are many other realities that are far divorced from your own however. Every thought, as I have told you, is an action and must seek to fulfill itself. It is a fragment, therefore. You are literally surrounded by other realities that you do not perceive consciously. Some of these are perceived by the inner self, but all are not.

I can perceive much that you do not for example, but I hardly perceive all, and what I do perceive is but a fraction of All That Is. Survival personalities exist both as they were and as they are. This is an important point. What they were still exists, and under certain conditions can be perceived.

Do you have an envelope for me?

B. And a G. A distant Minneapolis, Minnesota connection I do not understand. A long word, at least, that looks like that. Or Mississippi or such. With some foreign element, it seems, connected with the word. This leads Ruburt, now, toward a connection with the woman with whom she works.

A connection with light. Several small letters or numbers, and a stamped card, from a distant place. A hole in one. I do not know if this is a golf connection or to what it refers.

Do you have any questions? (Jane lowered the envelope briefly.

Something to do with an animal in a tree, that I do not understand.

(“A connection with a telephone call," General data. Remember that the Kecks were called long distance in Brooklyn, NY, from Elmira, by the Arnot Gallery before they made the trip to Elmira to do conservation work, for instance.

(The framework data may be associative, coming from the earlier framework references having to do, we think, with paintings and frames.

(“A distant Minneapolis, Minnesota connection I do not understand. A long word, at least, that looks like that. Or Mississippi or such. With some foreign element it seems, connected with the word.” This a good data that at first eluded us. We believe it refers to the book by Louis Pomerantz; the author himself; Paula Gerard, the illustrator; and the Artists Equity Association, discussed in the book’s forward.

(The object itself also refers to a situation where Jane worked closely with another woman—namely Caroline Keck, when doing conservation work at the gallery in July 1964. See page 230.

(“A hole in one. I do not know if this is a golf connection or to what it refers.” We know of no literal connection here. We speculate that it might refer to the Keck’s job as painting conservators, to repair damaged art.

(“An invitation to attend.” At this date Jane cannot recall. The Kecks are well known in their field, and it is possible some social affair was held for them while they were in Elmira and at the gallery doing their work. Jane could have been invited to attend. She knows she attended no such affair in their honor, but doesn’t know, now, whether she was asked to.

(4th Question: Who is the other man referred to besides myself? “Something to do with an animal in a tree, that I do not understand.” I had been hoping Seth, or Jane, might come up with Caroline Keck’s husband, Sheldon, or her son Larry, who is named on the object itself. See page 230. Of course I was involved with another man, and this involvement Seth picked up—since my drawing was appropriated by Larry Keck, as noted on the object.

(5th Question: Initials? “This may be your friend Gallagher, or your friend Mark, for the first name would seem to be William.” A miss here. As far as we know, neither Bill Gallagher or Bill Macdonnel (Mark) are involved with the object. Bill Macdonnel may have seen the pigeon drawing when it was on exhibit at the gallery; I do not know for sure. Could William have come from Larry, on the object?