1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:310 AND stemmed:gallagh)
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(During the holiday break two spontaneous sessions were held. The first was on Friday evening, December 23,1966, at the home of the Gallaghers, with the four of us present. Seth presented some very interesting material on flying saucers, time, other systems, etc. Peggy took notes that were somewhat incomplete because of Seth’s rapid pace. A copy of them will be attached to a later session.
[... 47 paragraphs ...]
This may be your friend Gallagher, or your friend Mark, for the first name would seem to be William. (Mark is Seth’s “entity name” for Bill MacDonnel.
[... 21 paragraphs ...]
(“And a G.” The illustrations for Louis Pomerantz’s book are done by Paula Gerard. But we think the G data a distortion, referring to our friend Bill Gallagher, as brought out in the question period.
[... 17 paragraphs ...]
(“and some connection with the date 1 1492, perhaps leading to an historical event.” With the date 1492 I thought Bill Gallagher cropped up in the data; this reference growing out of the other man reference; Bill and I had been discussing old sailing ships the other evening, and various dates, etc., some of the time in Jane’s presence.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(3rd Question: And the G? “A large capital G is the impression. A fancy G.” Again, some distortions evidently. As will be seen Jane here thought of our friend Bill Gallagher, hence the capital G.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
(“The other man, a friend rather than a relative.” Here Seth, or Jane, veers toward Bill Gallagher again, it seems. I had not met either Caroline or Sheldon Keck, nor Larry who was in Brooklyn.
(5th Question: Initials? “This may be your friend Gallagher, or your friend Mark, for the first name would seem to be William.” A miss here. As far as we know, neither Bill Gallagher or Bill Macdonnel (Mark) are involved with the object. Bill Macdonnel may have seen the pigeon drawing when it was on exhibit at the gallery; I do not know for sure. Could William have come from Larry, on the object?
[... 2 paragraphs ...]