“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

As I have mentioned many times, at present you focus your attentions and consciousness within the physical system. This alone can be compared to what Leary calls imprinting. Existence within any system will necessitate some imprinting. The imprinting simply involves an adjustment whereby consciousness is attuned to a particular station, so to speak.

The consciousness so attuned however is only a small portion of the individual’s total consciousness. In your system it is now fashionable to refer to this as the ego. The psychological structures are indeed so imprinted. However they are also aware and conscious of huge portions of themselves that are not so imprinted. They are aware of themselves simultaneously as individuals imprinted so as to react within several systems.

They maintain overall identity however, and follow through, or keep track of, these individuals which are themselves. A very small case in point would be an individual who is as aware simultaneously, of all his incarnations within your system, aware of them happening at once, and yet aware of himself as the whole who experiences these existences.

The separate incarnated personalities however are still separate identities. This is no contradiction at all. The personality structures of which I am speaking are far more advanced than this example. They are aware of many existences within many systems. They organize the basic ground reality into many patterns, and then operate and manipulate within them.

You are as a rule aware of one system only and not generally conscious of yourself as anything but a creature of that system. I refer here to humanity at this time. These psychological structures through value fulfillment, ever enlarge their abilities to form new realities and to act within them. It should not be forgotten that these environmental systems are directly created by those who dwell within them, and this includes your own.

Your idea of a god, in fact any concept held by humanity, represents at best a very small and insignificant idea, based upon the root assumptions of your own system. This does not mean such ideas are not legitimate as far as they go. Simply taking your own physical system and its physical universe, all intelligent life is simply not humanoid. Even in this limited conception of yours then, the concept of a human god is almost meaningless, and there are many other systems in which the word humanoid would have no real meaning at all.

This does not mean that the word indeed would have no meaning. Psychological frameworks and psychic gestalts form the basis for individual reality regardless of system. All of these do imply a whole, but the very term whole would again be meaningless if the whole, through self-conscious individual parts, were not conscious of itself.

Of itself (underlined), however, it will not carry you further than this. Of itself, it will not give you insight into past lives or future existences. Of itself it will not lift you out of the framework of the physical system, but merely allow you to see that system as it is. It will allow you to experience your relationship with the system, and the system’s relationship with the whole.

It will not of itself transport you to other systems. Your friend’s seminars (Gene Bernard’s) are within this system, in that they are composed of personalities who have been, and may again be, connected with it. (Long pause.)