“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The separate incarnated personalities however are still separate identities. This is no contradiction at all. The personality structures of which I am speaking are far more advanced than this example. They are aware of many existences within many systems. They organize the basic ground reality into many patterns, and then operate and manipulate within them.

Basic reality is not a chaos. It is a raw material. All diversity implies a whole, and if you theorize a whole then you must also imply diversity. These personality structures are like you a portion of basic reality, or All That Is. They are simply able to use and express and act within a larger framework of it.

In some personalities they will lead to what you call a mystic experience. They will carry the personality into new realms of perception. They will momentarily break up usual patterned organizations of perception. You will see with new inner eyes. To some extent you will view some aspects of reality apart from the usual physical structures that you impose upon it as a whole. There is therefore a freedom for the inner self.

It will not of itself transport you to other systems. Your friend’s seminars (Gene Bernard’s) are within this system, in that they are composed of personalities who have been, and may again be, connected with it. (Long pause.)

Of itself such an experience will not give you psychological mobility through other portions that compose your own becoming psychological structure. I say here “of itself" because certain personalities will be advanced enough to use such an experience as a springboard into precisely these discoveries. (Long pause.)

These will also be sifted of course through the layers of personal subconscious. The experience will still be meaningful without the ego, but it will not be as meaningful, and you will not be able to utilize in efficient manners. It must become a part of the organization of the whole present identity, you see.

(In addition, the idea of a federal building enters in, in that the object is a pseudopostage stamp. Monument can also apply, for in the U.S. only deceased persons are shown on stamps; thus an appearance on a stamp is a kind of tribute and a sort of monument. Jane said she did not know of this policy. I was familiar with it through collecting stamps years ago. Telepathy here?