1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:306 AND stemmed:draw)
[... 1 paragraph ...]
(The 79th envelope object was a drawing made by me on Friday, November 25th, at work. It was a joke on Don Wilbur; Don and his wife, Marilyn, visited us that Friday evening and I showed them the sketch. I thought also that Jane saw the object that evening, but as it developed she did not. Thus, she had never seen the drawing until after the experiment. This evening I placed it between two pieces of Bristol, then sealed it in the usual double envelopes.
[... 37 paragraphs ...]
Something by itself in the low left-hand corner. The impression is of a small image or drawing (shakes head, eyes closed) that might represent a foundation, house, federal building or church, or monument. Printed or embossed.
[... 13 paragraphs ...]
(“Can you say anything more about the drawing?”)
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
I am not certain that this is a literal drawing. It may be. An organization. If you have no more questions you may take your break. If you do I will answer them.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
(See page 203 for a copy of the object. As stated, it is a mock postage stamp I drew on Friday, November 25, 1966, at work. It is a spoof on Don Wilbur—"Young Donny"—and I showed it to Don and his wife, Marilyn, when they visited us that evening. The Gallaghers were also present. I thought the drawing had been passed around that evening and that Jane had seen it, but she said tonight that she had not. At any rate she had no recollection of seeing it before, to my surprise.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(“Connection with a picture.” The object is a drawing, or picture.
[... 6 paragraphs ...]
(“The impression is of a small image or drawing that might represent a foundation, house, federal building or church, or monument.” This is excellent data. The object is a drawing, and is small. See page 203.
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
(Jane also said the embossed data is legitimate, and stemmed from two things on the object: the “squiggly" frame I indicated in the drawing, and the fact that the center portion of the object had added dimension or thickness because of the two pieces of paper—actually one-ply drawing paper—being pasted together.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
(“Some indications of disaster, though this may be strong.” Humorously, Jane said the caricature of Don Wilbur could be called a disaster. Especially the unbeautiful features and the red eyeballs. See page 203. Actually the drawing bears no resemblance to Don, purposely being done in that manner.
(“Connection with colored paper.” Both pieces of paper making up the object are white. The color red also appears on the drawing, the data may be distorted.
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
(“A perpendicular arrangement with dots.” As noted in the sketch at the top of page 209, some of the lines on the object would be perpendicular as Jane held the envelope to her forehead. She said the dot data referred to the tiny red lines on the eyeballs of the drawing; to her they appeared to be dots, being quite small.
(“The object—an envelope or letter, and some reference to a third party.” The object is not an envelope or letter; see page 203. But being a drawing of a postage stamp, it is closely related to both such data. We are not sure about Seth’s reference to a third party; there could be several possibilities.
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
(3rd Question: Can you say anything more about the drawing? “In the corner?" As noted on page 209, apparently the object was centered inside the double envelopes. Jane however had an image of a small object in a corner of an envelope.
(“I am not certain that this is a literal drawing. It may be.” The object is a drawing. See page 203. Excellent data.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]