“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Therefore, within this context you trust treat your living things gently. They are actualities within your system. Philosophical tenets at your level must be carefully filled in by constructive emotions. There is strong value fulfillment to be gained where you are. It is good to know where you are, and the nature of your reality. You must still operate within its framework, however.

Philosophy should allow you to deal with them and not to avoid them. In one case of course there is nothing to avoid. Moment points, as I have discussed them, will clear up many of these points for you. There is every reason to explore inner reality, but this exploration should lead you to understand the nature of physical reality also. Perhaps your physical existence could be compared with an excellent book, given to you by a teacher.

When you have out-of-body experiences, you can become aware of the nature of inner reality more directly.

Through exploring inner reality you are indeed in contact with All That Is. The experience must be primarily a solitary one however on your part. You are both correct in assuming that you maintain your relative isolation. Specifically you should not now join a community of the sort that is being planned.

We shall see what we can do. A moment please. These are impressions, connected with the object.

(“What kind of images?”)

(“Well, I’d say it referred to events… You said strong colors—blues and yellows. These are not on the object. I was wondering what the connections are.”)

(1st Question: What kind of images? “The small leaflike shapes, for example.” Evidently this is a reference to handwriting.

(“I believe the object has images on it of people.” When I told Seth the object did not, Jane said it bothered her but not Seth. She said she thought it a good idea to continue the experiments in this vein however. I was trying to see what answers along the way would do to help spur Seth on towards more data, when I noted that he was off the track.