1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:285 AND stemmed:thought)

TES7 Session 285 September 12, 1966 8/130 (6%) Lodico abstracts geometric Colucci assumptions
– The Early Sessions: Book 7 of The Seth Material
– © 2014 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 285 September 12, 1966 9 PM Monday

[... 62 paragraphs ...]

(Seth helps out with a few connections after break, but in the meantime Jane and I had made our own. We checked up on one we thought correct after the session, and instead of verifying the data ended up confused, as will be explained.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(Disarray can refer to the jumbled appearance of my letter, used as object, with its crossed-out words, etc. Jane thought that disarray could also refer to the fact that abstract paintings are mentioned in the letter; to some people abstracts would be in disarray, as compared to conventional paintings showing things in the usual sense—flowers, houses, trees, etc.

[... 12 paragraphs ...]

(“Connection with a circumstance not repeated, and a road.” We make no connections for circumstance. Road is also too general. I thought of the long steep road leading up to the Colucci residence in the country. Marie Colucci is responsible for bringing my paintings to the attention of Dr. Lodico, as explained.

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

(“Two men and a woman. She wears a hat.” We thought of various combinations here, among them Marie Colucci, Dr. Lodico and myself, since we are closely involved with the object. We didn’t know whether Marie wears a hat, though. Seth verifies our interpretation, even though we couldn’t be sure.

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(“A small building or house with a flattish roof. A lightish color in sunlight. An orange color, and perhaps with scrolls, or scroll shapes, and a banner.” This turned out to be confusing data, and at the same time quite interesting. I thought it all of a piece when Seth delivered it, and still do. It may also involve direct telepathy, Jane reading my thoughts here.

(As stated, neither of us has met Dr. Lodico, and up to and including the time of this session did not know where he lived, although we had his address. All evening however, since writing the letter used as object, I had pictured a certain medical building in our neighborhood as probably the site of Dr. Lodico’s office. The building has a flat roof, is one story high, is of red (orange?) wood that looks lighter in sunlight, and has a series of shingles or name plates hanging outside that might be called banners. I also thought I remembered cast iron grill or scroll works as decoration on the building.

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

(7th Question continued: “The object I believe came through the mail, whether or not it is a photograph.” Very good, if not one hundred percent correct. The object is of course a letter; it is destined to go through the mail tomorrow. A related thought concerns the letter I had from Dr. Lodico, and mentioned earlier—this of course has already gone through the mail, on August 31.

(“Also a column, or columns.” Jane said she thought this data, tacked on at the close, referred to the fact that she has an idea to sell a weekly column on ESP to the local paper, and has been working up samples lately.

[... 14 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES7 Session 286 September 14, 1966 root assumptions stony item charges
TES5 Session 225 January 19, 1966 Colucci Negro Dr dentist Madison
ECS4 ESP Class Session, December 21, 1971 revelations scrambled labels Florence Sumari
TES7 Session 284 September 7, 1966 root agreements assumptions spacious device