1 result for (book:tes7 AND session:284 AND stemmed:assumpt)
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
Because dream objects appear and disappear, this does not mean they do not exist. In this particular instance the root agreement or assumption simply leads you astray.
Now. There is a cohesiveness to the inner universe, and to the systems that are not basically physical. But this cohesiveness is based upon an entirely different set of root assumptions or agreements, and these are the keys that alone will enable you to manipulate within, or understand, other systems.
There are several major root assumptions and many minor ones.
[... 4 paragraphs ...]
Five: Stability in time-sequence is not a prerequisite requirement for an object, except as a root assumption within the physical universe.
[... 6 paragraphs ...]
Now. Only if these basic assumptions are taken for granted will your projection experiences make sense to you.
Different rules simply apply. There are other basic root assumptions that I will give you. Your subjective experience here is highly important. That is, the vividness of any given experience in terms of intensity will be far more important than anything else.
Elements from past, present and future may be indiscriminately available to you. There is the tendency to judge such inner experience in terms of reliable physical assumptions, this being an error. You may conclude that a given experience is the result merely of subconscious fabrications, simply because the time elements are obviously intermixed, or physical coherence or sequence is not maintained.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
If you are trying to judge such an experience in terms of physical root assumptions, then it will be meaningless. You may, as I mentioned earlier, perceive the form of a building that never did exist physically, and never will in your universe. This does not mean that the form is an illusion. You are simply in a position where you can pick up and translate the energy pattern before you.
[... 22 paragraphs ...]