1 result for (book:tes6 AND session:279 AND stemmed:natur)

TES6 Session 279 August 15, 1966 5/137 (4%) card greeting Tunkhannock monumental envelope
– The Early Sessions: Book 6 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 279 August 15, 1966 9 PM Monday

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

My instructions concerning projection should tell you a good deal about the true nature of the self.

[... 9 paragraphs ...]

Now. Projections further extend the self and the identity, only this time in realms where the physical self cannot follow. Now this kind of projection, this extension of identity, is the true nature and the creative aspect of aggression. This and not war, is the meaning of aggression. It is a forward thrust of creative activity, forever extending itself in this manner, and instantly changed, and no longer what it was.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Each painting that you create represents the death of the self that you were before you created it. The changing self forever dies in this manner, and yet only this symbolic death insures psychic survival. There is no basic moral problem then when you consider the true nature of aggression, for it is highly creative, and without destruction there would be no existence. These are two faces of the same coin.

[... 13 paragraphs ...]

Now. Most systems have more reality than a painting, but not all of them. The very nature of some would be frightening to you. Your paintings are a creation, and yet by their nature they are limitations. They are limitations because their reality is necessarily limited by the elements you have chosen. You paint one house within a landscape for example. This is a creation. But two houses will never appear.

[... 44 paragraphs ...]

(Jane had one predominant image during the data, and this was of the greeting card. This is the reason for its inclusion with the actual object, since much of the following data actually deals with the greeting card. This is a case where the actual object, Leonard’s note to us, served as a springboard. The connection between the object and the greeting card is a legitimate and close one, and presumably would not have developed had Jane not correctly divined the nature of the object itself to begin with. The connection between the two being the fact that the object concerned a phone call to us from my mother; and that my mother was also the sender of the card to us.

[... 56 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES6 Session 249 April 6, 1966 ribbon quasars card Artistic bow
TES6 Session 278 August 8, 1966 Leonard postmark stamp geometrical postage
TES6 Session 262 May 25, 1966 poinsettia plant horizontal Bristol Callahan
TES5 Session 236 February 28, 1966 drawing smudges tracing horizontal stickers