“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Fur. Eight. A small square. A geometrical figure.

Small squares, not in line. April. Four. Connection with a letter or note, and a male. A distant religious connection. (Pause.)

(“A small square.” See the back of the object. Just to the right and above of the circular postmark is a geometrical triangular symbol. This small symbol is topped by a very small square, with a dot in it. The square about 1/16” on a side.

(Jane mentioned the 4¢ postage stamp on the object; strictly speaking the stamp is not quite square, but if the stamp had been perceived clairvoyantly perhaps its shape was interpreted as a square.

(“A geometrical figure.” Again, the triangular design, topped by the square containing a dot, just to the right and above the postmark on back of the card. Also—are circles, regarding the postmark itself, geometrical figures? Such a definition also includes the rectangular postage stamp.

(“Small squares, not in line.” It might be said the abstract shapes of the letters in Portland, Maine, within the circular postmark, are angular. Of course the letters are not in line, being confined within the circle shape. There could be other connections. The rest of the copy on the back of the postcard, whether printed or handwritten, is in line.

(Question: “What’s that about a geometrical figure?” “No. An equality. A balance. A balanced arrangement.” This data came after I had to repeat the question because of traffic noise. See the interpretation of the geometrical data page 313. All of the geometrical figures on the back of the object are balanced—the circular postmark, the small triangle and square just above and to the right of the postmark, and the rectangle of the postage stamp.