1 result for (book:tes6 AND session:267 AND stemmed:what AND stemmed:realiti)

TES6 Session 267 June 13, 1966 10/114 (9%) begonia plant office chain monolithic
– The Early Sessions: Book 6 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 267 June 13, 1966 9 PM Monday

[... 16 paragraphs ...]

Now. As I said earlier, sense data does have a reality, but this reality does not reside in an object. The object represents your interpretation of the basic reality. The energy belongs to the idea. In other words, the prime energy within physical reality resides precisely in those intangibles which do not, because of their nature, appear within physical frameworks. They give life and reality to the physical framework.

(Pause, and gesture, eyes closed.) There is not something “out there,” you see, which exists independently. There is something within that exists independently, and whose reality you perceive in a highly distorted fashion, through the use of the outer senses.

The inner senses can and do perceive this reality in an undistorted fashion. Your brain is itself a camouflage pattern. It can only translate and perceive what seems to be the evidence of the physical senses. It cannot step outside of itself. (Smile.) It is that which it attempts to investigate.

It is as much camouflage as the glass on the table, (pointing) and its knowledge must come through the physical system. Now. The mind is uncamouflaged. It perceives the uncamouflaged reality of sense data, or its sees the energy that exists. It sees the energy independently of the physical object, you see.

You can intellectually understand what I am telling you, but the brain (shaking head) cannot experience reality directly. This experience must come from the mind, through use of the inner senses. I want it understood that camouflage physical reality is indeed a reality, even while it is a distortion of something else.

[... 9 paragraphs ...]

Now for some other impressions, not connected necessarily with the object. The letters N, P, G, A. I do not know to what these refer. A small cross, connected with Dr. Instream’s past. The date 1873, connected with Dr. Instream’s parents, or parent.

[... 10 paragraphs ...]

(“What’s that about lineage?”)

[... 26 paragraphs ...]

(“A connection with March, perhaps 4 or 24.” Jane and I have thought back, and conclude that it is very possible I took the slip to the office during March. The plant is perhaps a foot tall now. We are sure I didn’t take it any earlier than March, so feel Seth is quite possibly correct here, without being able to demonstrate it. Neither of us have any idea of what day, 4, 24, etc., I took the begonia slip to the office.

(“Six three.” Jane pronounced this data as six, three, not 63. We don’t know what it means however. Six shows twice on the object, and we speculate that March is the third month of the year.

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

(“A distant connection with monolithic.” Our dictionary says monolith, while referring to one of a kind, also can mean one of large size. The object is a drawing of what is called a giant tubular begonia.

[... 34 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

UR2 Section 6: Session 731 January 20, 1975 plant selfhood ancestral ancestors chromosomes
TES6 Session 266 June 9, 1966 eagle moose bending object tag
TSM Chapter Four voice counteraction Rob parapsychologist hoarseness
TPS7 Deleted Session October 15, 1982 pills distance movement legs putty