“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(On the evening of February 2, during the 229th session, Seth said: “You will get no appreciable amount of snow, I believe for ten days or so...” See page 254. Seth was correct. Indeed, we began to receive our first appreciable snow within three hours after the ten days were up. This was a very heavy wet snow that began shortly before 1 AM Sunday, February 13; it continued until dawn, accumulating about an inch, then turned into a very heavy soaking rain that lasted all day Sunday and on into the night. Jane and I were quite conscious of the prediction Sunday because we had to be traveling. I had been keeping track of it in the meantime, however, and noted that we received a few very light dustings of snow during the ten day interim. Actually, the weather has been so warm that most of the heavy snow received two weeks ago has melted.

An entrance, and a schedule. A connection with three people, and a fourth who is not present. An initiation, and a bringing together of fragments. Four, the number four. A connection with an older man.

These are still impressions: two houses separated by grass. The numbers three, four, five, six. Six being significant.

Too many too soon. November six three, and a letter that did not meet your approval. A connection with something twice, and five in a circle.

(I read the data to her before she opened the envelope. Jane pointed out three instances in it where she had personal associations with Seth’s data, and as it turned out all three would have been in error had she voiced them.

(“A connection with three people, and a fourth who is not present.” We thought this a too-vague reference to my brother and his wife, and their daughter, and the groom.

(“The numbers three, four, five, six. Six being significant.” We did not make anything out of this particularly.

(“Too many too soon. November six three”, are very accurate references to Linda, but are here not explained because of personal reasons on her part. The data are available however to anyone making a study of these experiments. The numbers refer to November 1963; during this month Linda was involved in a strong emotional experience that was unique for her.

(“A connection with something twice” is another quite accurate reference by Seth to personal matters involving Linda, and data on this are withheld here for the same reason announced above. The three pieces of data that are not explained in this experiment are the best, incidentally, that Seth gave in connection with the object.

(We were discussing the data when Seth resumed. The first couple of sentences of his discussion concerned the three items noted above. He seemed in the mood to continue for a while, and to discuss the envelope data, so I began to ask questions. Jane resumed with her glasses on, and with her eyes opening occasionally, at 10:40.)

(Here now Seth elaborated further on the three points not explained: Too many too soon; November six three; and A connection with something twice.

(“What about the numbers, three, four, five?”)