“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

You are not aware of your experiences in their entirety, for you experience events in a consecutive manner. You are therefore aware of your dreams only in a consecutive manner. You are hardly familiar with all of the dream experiences of your dreaming self, and barely familiar with any of their implications. The dreaming self is to some considerable degree conscious of the self which we shall here term the probable self. The probable self is somewhat like a twin self to the dreaming personality, for neither the experiences of the dreaming self nor the probable self occur within the complete radius of physical reality.

(For an idea of the complexity implied here,in Volume 3 see the 88th session, in which Seth goes into the structure of the subconscious to some degree.)

The information is sifted often through the dreaming self to the subconscious, which has intimate knowledge of the ego with which it is closely connected. The subconscious makes its own value judgments here, and passes these on to the ego. But then the ego must come to its own decision.

The seance given by a woman, as described in the book, with dark hair, parted in the middle. Some connection here also with Dr. Instream’s book on spiritism; that is, his own book.

A disagreement here somewhere, in connection with two men. This is not the disagreement that Dr. Instream spoke of to you and Ruburt when you met. (Pause at 10:15. See Session 169 in Volume 4.)

(“An initiation, and a bringing together of fragments.” We thought this of course a reference to Linda’s marriage. The use of the word fragments here, by Seth, led us to think that reincarnational motives might be involved in the marriage; but I did not think to quiz Seth about this when he resumed. In the very early sessions Seth began to use fragment as a reference to each physical personality manifested by the entity.

(“Too many too soon. November six three”, are very accurate references to Linda, but are here not explained because of personal reasons on her part. The data are available however to anyone making a study of these experiments. The numbers refer to November 1963; during this month Linda was involved in a strong emotional experience that was unique for her.

(“A connection with something twice” is another quite accurate reference by Seth to personal matters involving Linda, and data on this are withheld here for the same reason announced above. The three pieces of data that are not explained in this experiment are the best, incidentally, that Seth gave in connection with the object.

(Here now Seth elaborated further on the three points not explained: Too many too soon; November six three; and A connection with something twice.

The “grand affair” and the “ballroom” implication, you see—the connection somewhat distorted here was the formality of the wedding—clothes, the wedding clothes, which did lead Ruburt to think of a ball.