1 result for (book:tes5 AND session:223 AND stemmed:ruburt)

TES5 Session 223 January 16, 1966 4/21 (19%) teapot Brotzanin Lemons voyages Zanzibar
– The Early Sessions: Book 5 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 223 January 16, 1966 Approximately 10 PM Sunday Unscheduled

[... 8 paragraphs ...]

(In talking about his voyages, Seth said that we would have to bear with Ruburt now, because Ruburt—Jane—knew very little about geography; this I can vouch for. Jane now spoke quite slowly, with her head down and her eyes closed, whereas before her eyes had opened often and her manner had been very animated and cheerful.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(After the Gallaghers left Seth and I continued to talk. Seth told me I would become a very well-known painter; Ruburt, he said, knew nothing about artists’ agents or their locations in New York City, he said for the record, adding that there is an agent on 62nd street who can be of great help to me. This is the correct neighborhood, I can attest from past experience. He did not give me the agent’s name. Seth told me I have been working to free my intuitions; I already have enough discipline. With Jane it has been the other way around. Both of us are making good progress. Seth also said that my work would become known partly because of the source of inspiration for some of it—the visions I have that grow out of these sessions.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

(Without indulging in wishful thinking, Jane and I thought we saw some points of similarity in the above data and a miniature teapot, namely the fact that the test object could be held in the hand, had a connection with water, and an indentation. Since this was Jane’s first such attempt with the Gallaghers, I was curious as to what Seth would say. He now told me that the rock or stone impression was his error, and not Jane’s, or Ruburt’s.

(Seth said he was not careful enough in sorting out his own impressions. He picked up accurately enough that the test object could be held in the hand, had a connection with water and an indentation—the opening in the teapot—but erred in the rock or stone terminology, the color and the word nondescript. Bill indicated the color of the teapot in his sketch, saying the object is anything but nondescript. Seth said Ruburt transmitted accurately enough the data he gave. He also said that we would conduct a series of tests with the Gallaghers, involving objects, and that they would be successful.)

[... 1 paragraph ...]

Similar sessions

TES6 Session 254 April 27, 1966 kettle Lilliard teapot gliddiard looming
TES8 Rob Pendulum Q&A June 12, 1967 tomato canned corn pendulum margarine
TES8 Session 339 May 3, 1967 coastline garage dunes Chula Vista
DEaVF2 Chapter 7: Session 913, May 5, 1980 Steffans Mrs woodcuts David heroic