1 result for (book:tes5 AND session:218 AND stemmed:communic)

TES5 Session 218 December 15, 1965 9/427 (2%) Priestley Peggy Dunne San seminar
– The Early Sessions: Book 5 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 218 December 15, 1965 9 PM Wednesday as Scheduled

[... 84 paragraphs ...]

Otherwise I should be all life force and no self. Now, I communicate through this level of Ruburt’s consciousness. It is subconscious to him or to his ego, but it is not without consciousness by any means. And again, I communicate through that level. At my own level this is not in itself difficult.

The difficulty lies in making this communication, which is direct from me, to what would be Ruburt’s time three self, clear to the time one self of Ruburt’s, which must speak these words, in what could be called Priestley’s time one.

Communications such as these, incidentally, can be explained quite adequately within Priestley’s system. Very nicely indeed. Not thoroughly but nicely. Completely, if you do not ask too many tricky questions.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

Now I could indeed be Ruburt’s number six self, you see. I am not, but I could be. It is entirely possible however, using Ruburt as an example, for Ruburt’s number six self, to communicate with Ruburt’s number one self; these communications sifting through the intervening selves however, and unfortunately. Now these various times of Priestley’s and Dunne’s have much in common with the planes of which I am speaking in our discussions, and the value fulfillment of our material is akin to Priestley’s insistence on depth within any given moment.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

At this point I am at the level, again, that could be compared to Dunne’s number six self, as myself. I communicate through the third undifferentiated layer, that could be compared to Priestley’s consciousness at number three time.

[... 10 paragraphs ...]

—believe it or not. For we are actually, you see, part of the same entity now. Therefore, if you will bear with me, you represent one of the selves through which I must travel in order to communicate. Is this clear?

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(Seth began explaining his source and the source of this material in the very early sessions. In the 15th session for example he likened his state to the dream state of a physical individual. By the 24th session he was dealing with the problems involved in communicating with us. By the 63rd session he was explaining his state as energy not materialized into mass; this after telling us in the 54th session that Jane, Seth and I had been part of the same entity once; he could not tell us this earlier, he said, because Jane and I would have immediately jumped to the conclusion that he was part of Jane’s subconscious mind.

(In the 45th session Seth said a little to the effect that I assisted her in drawing upon the energy necessary for these communications. In the 88th and 152nd sessions Seth went into Jane’s third undifferentiated layer to some extent, then elaborated a little more on the relationship between us in the 157th session.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

It is because of the peculiar connection of selves that our communications are possible. It is for the same reason that such communications are relatively rare, for many conditions and circumstances are necessary; and the number one self is made to bear strains unfamiliar to it, and to perceive data which does not make sense within its number one time system.

[... 309 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES5 Session 226 January 24, 1966 John Cleveland McKeown Searle Hilton
TES5 Session 214 December 6, 1965 discotheque napkin Washington dancers ultraviolet
TPS2 Session 607 April 3, 1972 Alma Porcius Marcus Cato statesman
TES7 Session 294 October 17, 1966 statue Nassau San hill galleons