1 result for (book:tes4 AND session:184 AND stemmed:draw)
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(Tracing of my drawing used in the 4th envelope test, in Session 184, September 3,1965.)
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
(The double envelope contained a simple line drawing I executed in black ink on ordinary white paper. It was folded once. I chose this subject matter in an effort to see how Seth would handle more abstract subjects. The drawing is reproduced on page 232; it is a pen tracing made from the original on a light table.
[... 14 paragraphs ...]
(Jane herself made the possible connection that the “...unpleasant circumstance... in which a woman was involved,” could be entangled with the day I made the drawing; this being last Wednesday, when we missed our regular session because of visitors. See my notes on page 233. Seth’s information following this statement connected itself with the drawing easily enough, even to the “color gray,” which arises from the shadow effect I achieved in the drawing by using closely-spaced parallel lines.
(Bill Gallagher pointed out that my name and date on the drawing, besides being a “sign,” also contained a combination of 10 letters and numbers, as “something 10 times.” We do not know what to make of such interpretations.
[... 12 paragraphs ...]
(End at 12:25. Jane was dissociated as usual. She had no visual images that she was aware of, she said, while giving the original test data. As far as she knew she had let Seth through without thinking about anything herself. Again, see my notes on page 233. It appears that many impressions can attach themselves to such a simple thing as a small pen drawing.
(Referring to the drawing, it can be seen that there is an interlocking group of 7 designs or blocks on the right, and a like group of 3 on the left. My literal mind also notes a single block beneath each of the larger groups, but Seth did not refer to these. We suppose the “familiar location” can refer to our own apartment wherein I made the drawing; or perhaps to the apartment house itself, in which our visitors also live. And surely the drawing contains a “multiplicitude of designs” and “crisscross shapes”.
(The drawing can be “a spread of sorts,” but we see no particular connection with grass, nor with “something spectacular.” I did not think to query Seth about these points as we sat talking near the end of the session.
[... 42 paragraphs ...]