1 result for (book:tes3 AND session:147 AND stemmed:manuscript)
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(In the 92nd session, of September 28, 1964, Seth predicted the sale of this specific book by name. See page 40. In the 104th session he gave details we think may refer to the offices of F. Fell in NYC, involving a red chair, certain individuals, etc. This material can be shortly checked out. A woman was mentioned as influencing a sale; Jane’s editor, Mara Thomases, is a woman. She was not editor when the manuscript was submitted to F. Fell.
[... 4 paragraphs ...]
There are, as you know, actions within actions, thrusts forward and backward, in and out and in all directions. And so in Ruburt’s manuscript there existed a vitality that of itself would bring about other actions, as indeed I foresaw.
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
Any action that affects the physical individual also has its reality within many other fields, and its effects and its nature are felt within them. A manuscript, or indeed any art form, contains action and sets up its own climate, either of psychological acceptance or rejection. This climate is more than the result of the materials or subject matter or nature of which the work is composed. It goes without saying that such a work actually contains a portion of focused psychic energy, which is action, and which has its effects.
The energy charge in this particular manuscript is not only very vivid, but well focused. It has already had a vivid effect on more people than you know.
[... 25 paragraphs ...]