1 result for (book:tes3 AND session:141 AND stemmed:inde)

TES3 Session 141 March 17, 1965 7/56 (12%) perception patterns action Piper minor
– The Early Sessions: Book 3 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 141 March 17, 1965 9 PM Wednesday as Scheduled

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

(Jane returned at 7:05 PM, and confirmed my thought. She had indeed, on impulse, visited Bob and Mary Piper, friends of ours whom we had not seen for many months. She had not consciously been thinking of visiting them when she left me. She recalled mentioning my name often in conversation with Mary Piper, particularly to the effect that I might be concerned because she, Jane, did not return promptly. It will be recalled that the Pipers witnessed the 73rd session [See Volume 2].

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

Since action is not apart from structure, but is indeed the formulator of structure, then it is obvious that generally the type, nature, extent and scope of characteristic perception patterns of a consciousness will determine its physical structure, and not the other way around.

[... 23 paragraphs ...]

The self, then, is not static by any means. It has no arbitrary boundaries. The term itself is used only for convenience; and indeed the concept of the self is a concept of the ego, which considers itself the self.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The self then, unknown to the ego, perceives itself in a vast variety of experiences, and in, indeed, a vast number of realities. Each of these so-called realities, for one blends into the other, could be termed, or viewed as, a separate field. Each is therefore composed of the characteristic perception patterns that happen to lie within it, and these so-called minor fields could then be termed other selves, or minor selves, from the standpoint of the self that we are considering.

[... 2 paragraphs ...]

As this effective field of perception patterns changes, so do the apparent boundaries of the practical self. It is imperative that we move away from the concept of a self as an indivisible, rigid and limited reality. Indeed, I hesitate almost to continue, since I do not want to confuse you.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

You can here indeed see where I am leading you.

The deeply and strongly dimensioned sphere I used as an analogy for an action, if you recall, for any portion of action; you can now indeed further imagine one entity being composed of such an action, with egos like many faces looking outward in all directions, and each perceiving vastly different fields of reality; looking inward and outward, backward and forward as it were, through and beyond. And yet each action, or entity, is a part of another, and is both within and without another. And none of it is meaningless, and yet in a basic manner all of it has the meaning that you give it.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES3 Session 138 March 8, 1965 dilemma action identity vitality stability
TES9 Session 463 February 5, 1969 atoms perception molecules electromagnetic paranormal
TES3 Session 137 March 3, 1965 action identity electrical perceived vitality
TES2 Session 62 June 15, 1964 gestalt cooperation identity energy maintained