he

1 result for (book:tes3 AND session:136 AND stemmed:he)

TES3 Session 136 March 1, 1965 8/41 (20%) duplicate identical electrical sender transmitted
– The Early Sessions: Book 3 of The Seth Material
– © 2013 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 136 March 1, 1965 9 PM Monday as Scheduled

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

During the rest of the week, he should if possible forget about the marketing aspect. This is a suggestion, and that is all.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

The thought originally held by A is still retained by A, yet a seemingly identical thought reaches B. A has lost nothing. That is, in sending the thought, in trying to duplicate the thought, he himself still retains it, so what is passed on to receiver B? This is rather important, since an explanation will do much to account for the frequent difference that occurs in telepathic communications.

[... 10 paragraphs ...]

Prime identities cannot be duplicated. Duplication, exact duplication, is always merely an effect of insufficient knowledge. In some cases two thoughts may indeed appear identical, but whether or not examination can show it, such exact duplication is impossible. Now. When receiver B receives this transmitted thought, he may react and interpret that part of the thought that is similar to the original.

He may, on the other hand, react to and interpret portions of the thought that are not similar. He may then react and interpret the similarity or the difference. His reaction here depends on several circumstances, including the intensity of the electrical pulsations that compose the thought, and his own inner facility in reacting to particular ranges of intensities. Habitually individuals establish various overall frequencies that they are able to handle, for various reasons that I believe I explained to you somewhat earlier.

An individual will therefore feel more at home operating within certain frequencies, and he will feel less at home with others. The original thought is used as a pattern, therefore, for the creation of a new electrical reality, which may or may not be directed at any given receiver. It is obvious that the attempt to duplicate is present; and were it not for this attempt to duplicate, then there would be little similarity between any separate identities.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

(Break at 9:54. Jane was well dissociated. She said she thought it was a good session, because “my head feels as though there’s absolutely nothing else in it but the session.” She thought Seth was trying to use her abilities as best he could, in order to present the material without mix-up.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

The receiver will understand and interpret in general the intensity range that he is in the habit of using himself. Some, or a portion of, the transmitted thought may fall within his range, and some may not. He may pick up the portions of the thought which are similar to the main thought, in which case some scientific proof of sorts can be achieved.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

He does not interpret the thought. He interprets its meaning, and forms a new thought identity.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES4 Session 153 May 10, 1965 tension landscape action creation ego
TES3 Session 137 March 3, 1965 action identity electrical perceived vitality
TES3 Session 131 February 10, 1965 electrical density denseness intensities field
SS Part One: Chapter 3: Session 520, March 25, 1970 permanent form environment constant thought