“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Again, also I have said nothing about Ruburt’s change in status at the gallery, for my own reasons. And it will do you no good to ask me what they are.

(Here Jane pointed emphatically at me. It will be recalled also that Mark is Bill’s entity name.)

(This statement took me by surprise, until I remembered that in the 63rd session, June 17, 1964, page 159, Seth had given a date of Sept. 2 in which plans “may be born at that date which will affect his participation in his professional field.” I refer of course to John Bradley, entity name Philip; and John had been a witness to the 63rd session.)

Ruburt is blocking me. Perhaps two women and a man, and loud voices, with a child listening close by.

I will now, in line with my policy of balancing out our sessions, end this one. I bid you all a fond good evening—and you cannot blame me now for taking up more than the allotted time which we have allowed ourselves.

The room in his dream had a circular ceiling which represented, if he will excuse me, the womb of his mother, from which the adult must finally symbolically escape.

(Here Jane was looking at me.)

He should endeavor to tie the two together, in some kind of package. I will not make any practical suggestions anymore unless you ask me on the proverbial bended knee. I meet with suspicion; not one of my suggestions are followed.

There must be a balance, and there shall be. Indeed, there is here, between intuition and discipline. But I do know laws of energy that neither of you are acquainted with. Far be it from me to tamper with Ruburt’s precious ego. The assistant to the director of the Arnot Art Gallery is not to be tampered with indeed!