1 result for (book:tes1 AND session:21 AND stemmed:entiti)

TES1 Session 21 February 3, 1964 13/88 (15%) Throckmorton maid Lessie Dick daughter
– The Early Sessions: Book 1 of The Seth Material
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Session 21 February 3, 1964 9 PM Monday as Instructed

[... 32 paragraphs ...]

These questions are worked out by entities between lives, and each entity has many problems to consider. In your technological age such problems are easier to solve than in the past. That is, contemporaries even from different continents can meet in a simpler fashion. The basic problems are necessarily kept from the personality by the entity simply because so many psychological undercurrents would sweep the ego off its feet, and pull the rug of sanity from beneath it.

In some instances this happens despite the personality’s attempt to hide the weight of the past. Also on many occasions the personality escapes the problems entirely. What happens here is that the subconscious communicates with the entity through the inner senses, to the effect that the present personality is not strong enough to handle the problem.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

If your mother or father found continued life together completely unbearable, which incidentally they do not, then in all likelihood one of their entities would suggest through the inner senses that the relationship be discontinued. If the advice was not heeded, and as the situation grew worse, a danger point would arise beyond which the personalities could not safely continue their association.

[... 4 paragraphs ...]

I am never sure really if my analogies help matters or not, but here is another. If it will make things easier for you, you can think in terms of the entity and the brain and a mind.

The entity in this case would be compared to the mind. The brain would be more or less what it is, that is, the brain of the present personality existing on a camouflaged plane. As the brain gives orders and communicates messages to the various parts of the physical body, so would the mind or entity do in like manner. The mind would contain all data having to do with past existences and intertwining purposes, problems and relationships, but it would only give such data to the brain as was necessary for its present existence.

That is the analogy. In actuality the mind is but a portion of the entity which looks out for the personality on the camouflage plane. Your guardian angel legends and such refer to this part of the entity, which is the mind and which is attached to the present personality during this particular existence. The mind helps to keep the personality from going too far astray. I use the term personality to include the whole person. I use it to express the entirety manifested in physical form, in one life.

The mind as I mentioned earlier is part of the inner plane. It is a mere portion of the entity itself.

(“Is it possible for us to contact our own entities?”

[... 1 paragraph ...]

You are silly sometimes, Joseph. For shame. From the information you have been given before, and from the above paragraph, you should know that you are in contact with your own entities, in that the mind is a portion of the entity to begin with. I have told you that communication between a present personality and the entity is carried on by means of the inner senses, and I have told you that in these sessions you use the inner senses. Surely then the question answers itself.

Also in a very real sense, taking the above into consideration, you are your own entities, though in operation consciously on this particular plane only. In many dreams you talk to yourself, so to speak—that’s a pun, don’t miss it.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

In your visions you are in contact with your entity. Your entity is merely a part of yourself with which you are not completely familiar.

[... 1 paragraph ...]

I made a remark, after sessions I’m afraid, to Ruburt one evening—I couldn’t resist—to the effect that you would both be better off if you would think in terms of your entities. Do not think of your entities as foreign alien individuals ready to gobble you up. Even though I speak jokingly of assimilating my poor Frank Watts, this is not the case at all.

(Jane received this remark on January 23, 1964, according to her notes, just as she was dropping off to sleep: “If you would identify yourself with your entity instead of with your present personality, you’d be a lot better off.” It woke her up and she immediately wrote it down.

[... 31 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

TES1 Session 23 February 5, 1964 breathes admit camouflage plane Throckmorton
TES1 Session 10 December 20, 1963 board brother wolves Loren wound
TES1 Session 12 January 2, 1964 wires cubes plane board female
TPS2 Deleted Session October 13, 1972 Timothy Foote Seagull Bach Claus