“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

So if I insist that I’ve communicated with Jane at times, then I’m obligated to consider statements from others claiming the same thing. But in ordinary terms, even if my wife’s death has left me more open and vulnerable to psychic possibilities, I still shrink from offering any sort of blanket assurance. (“Yes, I’m convinced that you have reached Jane, just as I have.”) I’m not contradicting myself when I note that perhaps — and I’ve suspected for a long time that ultimately this is correct — it is true that on some far levels of consciousness and communication that we do not (or even cannot) understand at this “time,” each person who is so inclined to do so has at least touched a Jane who responded clearly enough. She will continue to do so. In this view, those elements in such messages that have no meaning for me can be only distortions on the part of the medium or the letter-writer or the poet. I do think that communication among entities, whether they’re physical or nonphysical, is always going on, and from every conceivable angle and in every way. Hardly a new thought, yet grasping it, or even speculating about it, is to touch upon a portion of the mystery of life. (And from where you are, Jane, what do you think of my very cautious approach?)

“Yes. Yes.” [...]

[...] But yes, the people in the small villages did; and wheat and barley. [...]

[...] But I saw the soles of the man’s feet, wrinkled and brown and, yes, without shoes, lifting after each stride. [...]

“Yes. Yes,” I said, near tears. [...]

“Yes,” Rob said.

Yes. [...]

“Yes, I think we have, Seth.”

Yes. [...]

“Yes,” Rob said.