1 result for (book:notp AND session:777 AND stemmed:what AND stemmed:realiti)
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
Whatever your language, you perceive trees, mountains, people, oceans. You never see a man merge with a tree, for example. This would be considered an hallucinatory image. Your visual data are learned and interpreted so that they appear as the only possible results of those data. Inner vision can confound you, because in your mind you often see images quite clearly that you would dismiss if your eyes were open. In the terms of which we are speaking, however, the young species utilized what I have called the “inner senses” to a far greater degree than you do. Visually, early man did not perceive the physical world in the way that seems natural to you.
[... 4 paragraphs ...]
A man, wondering what a tree was like, became one, and let his own consciousness flow into the tree. Man’s consciousness mixed and merged with other kinds of consciousness with the great curiosity of love. A child did not simply look at an animal, but let its consciousness merge with the animal’s, and so to some extent the animal looked out through the child’s eyes.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
In thinking your own private thoughts, you also add to a larger psychic and mental reality of which you are part. Your languages program your perceptions, and limit your communications in certain terms (underlined) as much as they facilitate it.
[... 6 paragraphs ...]
(10:50. Jane had “strange feelings” connected with tonight’s session. She felt somewhat disoriented, yet couldn’t explain very well in just what way. She’d taken many long pauses in delivering the material — a few of which I’ve indicated — but hadn’t been at all concerned about them while in trance. She said that at such times she was “waiting for the material to assemble and translate itself:” Originally it wasn’t verbal at all. Resume at 11:13.)
[... 8 paragraphs ...]