“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

In the terms in which you ask the question, the answer is no.

Only in the terms in which you ask the question. In larger terms, there is no such thing as destruction; and your second question does not follow logically from the first one. Now if you will look at the script when you receive it, you will see what I mean. You ask questions without considering the answers that have been given. Think of the answers before you form your next question.

([Ron:] “Yes, but I don’t necessarily agree with the logic of your answers.”)

I do not need you to agree with my logic. I need you to understand the faulty quality in your own logic, and that must come from yourself and not from me. Now, wait. Part of this is due to the fact that you form questions before you comprehend the nature of the answers that you have received. Read the script. Find out the answers I have given you, and then form your questions.

I have told you. My last answer implies that answer.

We will ignore the last part of your sentence and agree with the first part. And I shall certainly see to it, if I have any abilities to do so, that in your next life, you are put in the position of answering someone whose mind works exactly as yours does.

That is what I told you operates within your reality, and you did not listen to my answer. When you read the text, it will be simply clarified. In your reality, the stance that you adapt is a necessary one, and you must hold to it. The fact that it does only apply to your system need not presently concern you.