1 result for (book:ecs4 AND heading:"esp class session januari 25 1972" AND stemmed:was)
(During class it was mentioned that certain members who hadn’t been coming regularly were back. Bette said that some members got more information than others did.)
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
([Bette:] “Yes, but I think I was set up for that. After I said that this one [Mary Ellen] told me something that she has been thinking all week and all I did was mouth her words for her again.”)
[... 6 paragraphs ...]
It was a lovely benediction. Why can’t you leave it at that?
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
What did you do with the first part of the Sumari chant that was to all of you? You did not even tell Ruburt that that went on, so let’s see to it that someone tells him and then how far along with it you were able to go and I think we should start with our fine late Sumarian over there in the corner (to Rachel).
[... 9 paragraphs ...]
(During break a discussion of the campfire scene and the sacrificing of a baby. Molly was commenting on Rachel’s dream of space without objects and objects without space when Seth came through.)
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
In your reality you can, if you let go of the concepts. Now, I tell you, and I have told you many times, and regardless of how intellectually confusing it may sound to you in greater terms, there simply is no evil. And as long as you are aware of what seems to be evil effects then you are still in ignorance. Now there is space within objects and objects within space. Remember that. Now violence is a type of action and it is often misdirected. Whatever violence you did you did because you thought it was good and met a worthy end then; therefore, be careful of those ideas that you entertain now and what you will do to defend them. No one ever does violence for something he considers unworthy. The most bloodthirsty acts have been done because men believed themselves right and so they killed to uphold their worthy ideas. So be even playful with your ideas and what you believe, for no idea is worth killing for in your terms.
Now there was quite a bit more to that particular drama and it will come to you, and to you, and to you, and to you and to you and to you and to you and to you.And above all to you.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
I was indeed.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
I was at the center of the campfire and Ruburt was there in another guise.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
He was indeed.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
([Bette:] “Seth, did I give her a drink out of a gourd? It was a split gourd and I offered her this drink before she had to leave.”)
[... 1 paragraph ...]
([Natalie:] “I was there as a young boy.”)
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
([Arnold:] “Was I involved in this episode?”)
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
(Bette said she felt a section of the campfire scene was missing.)
[... 5 paragraphs ...]
([Bette:] “Was Rachel the waitress in this dumpy bar that you and I were in?”)
I was never in a dumpy bar.
([Bette:] “Was she the waitress that was waiting on us at the table that I saw what you did the other night?”)
She was the waitress and it was not a dumpy bar.
[... 11 paragraphs ...]