1 result for (book:ecs2 AND heading:"esp class session novemb 17 1970" AND stemmed:hand)

ECS2 ESP Class Session, November 17, 1970 6/95 (6%) Rachel accident Ned Dennis hunting
– The Early Class Sessions: Book 2 Sessions 1/6/70 to 12/29/70
– © 2008 Laurel Davies-Butts
– ESP Class Session, November 17, 1970 Tuesday

[... 14 paragraphs ...]

A mistake is when you do not know what you are doing, when momentarily, you lose sight of your goals or when you do not live up to them. You can turn a mistake into a challenge. If you make a mistake you can learn from it because you realize it is your fault. If, on the other hand, you believe an accident happens to you that you had nothing to do with, you can learn nothing from it except to duck. This was your break.

[... 35 paragraphs ...]

([Rachel:] “I agree with you, I like brandy better. Now, the other night, the incident with my hand, was it my vivid imagination or something else?”)

It was a combination of several things. Now, give Ruburt back his wine, and I will tell you. First of all, there were some elements of fear combined with fear having to do with underlying fears that you are having difficulty—in the physical universe, and you acted this out with the hand. This also had to do something with the leg and the foot difficulties earlier, both being limbs and objects of manipulation in physical reality. Now, the hand also represents freedom. The incident represents two opposites. One of freedom as the hand, as a hand being able to rise. And the other, lack of freedom, as for example, the hand not being able to move. You were objectifying, in your mind, two opposites and attempting to correlate them. Do you follow me?

[... 1 paragraph ...]

You think about it. There are some other connections. Give us a moment. Five, representing the five fingers and the ways in which the hand itself, with the five fingers, can operate in physical reality. Now these are symbolic images that you are not consciously aware of that were, however, behind the incident. They are objects, the five fingers, of manipulation in physical reality.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

Think about what I have said. The connection between the foot and hand will be clear. Give yourself the suggestion that the connection will appear to you.

[... 5 paragraphs ...]

(To Rachel) Now, in your own description of your experience you came close to making the connections of which I spoke, for the impression of the hand frightened you, that it was so old and decrepit and, subconsciously you connected it, at that time, with your foot when it was bad. You thought immediately in terms of the hand being old and dead. If you had not, the hand would have written. You were frightened for your own physical hand and, therefore, you stopped the flow of information that could have come. It was a subconscious connection on your part. You allowed yourself the freedom to begin with but then you interpreted the appearance of your hand as the hand of a very old woman and became frightened. Now, do you understand a little more? Then, by all means, have some brandy.

[... 28 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

ECS2 ESP Class Session, September 22, 1970 Rachel love remarriage Ned reawakened
ECS1 ESP Class Session, September 16, 1969 Matt Areofranz Mimi Rachel palm
ECS2 ESP Class Session, October 27, 1970 Florence puzzle leash degradation segment
ECS3 ESP Class Session, January 12, 1971 Joel Daniel violent Ned wring