two

1 result for (book:ecs2 AND heading:"esp class session novemb 17 1970" AND stemmed:two)

ECS2 ESP Class Session, November 17, 1970 8/95 (8%) Rachel accident Ned Dennis hunting
– The Early Class Sessions: Book 2 Sessions 1/6/70 to 12/29/70
– © 2008 Laurel Davies-Butts
– ESP Class Session, November 17, 1970 Tuesday

[... 43 paragraphs ...]

(To Sue.) Now this one over here. You are doing very well, as you know, in your dream work. You are doing well in your creative work also, and in your writing. You forget there are problems you must work through, and that in the struggle to create further creativity results. If you are satisfied with less, then you do not search further. Now, Ruburt’s way is too expensive. Your way you can pay, do you see the difference? You have your own way. It is too expensive to try to follow someone else’s way, and that is the message of the dream. Also, remember your own childlike self and the two of you, when you think of your son, imagine what you were like at that age and how difficult it was to communicate to your parents.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

It was a combination of several things. Now, give Ruburt back his wine, and I will tell you. First of all, there were some elements of fear combined with fear having to do with underlying fears that you are having difficulty—in the physical universe, and you acted this out with the hand. This also had to do something with the leg and the foot difficulties earlier, both being limbs and objects of manipulation in physical reality. Now, the hand also represents freedom. The incident represents two opposites. One of freedom as the hand, as a hand being able to rise. And the other, lack of freedom, as for example, the hand not being able to move. You were objectifying, in your mind, two opposites and attempting to correlate them. Do you follow me?

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

I said earlier that two things were involved and one was fear. I did not say the fear was justified. I also connected it up with the foot symptom. Do you follow me now?

([Rachel:] “I can’t connect the two.”)

Subconsciously you connect the two very well, and the connection will appear to you. Do you want another sip of wine?

[... 6 paragraphs ...]

(To Giselle.) Now, I have a remark over here and it is this. You are still, to some extent, frightened. Now, this has to do in some regard to work you did in the past when it was highly dangerous to speak of your beliefs or to remember this code of ethics. So try to allow yourself greater freedom for the two of you can work very well together. Do not be too timid. Be courageous. He can use your courage also, and you need to taste it yourself.

[... 17 paragraphs ...]

(To Ned and Sue.) And these two, back here, should have an experience worth recording. The third trip, indeed. The odds are up to you. You are odder than I am.

[... 7 paragraphs ...]

She is, indeed, but that is not the reason for your reaction. Do not confuse the two. You are annoyed because you are annoyed and it has nothing to do with her overreaction and overindulgence. I did not say you were a bitchy parent. I was not that harsh or severe. That was your interpretation.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

ECS2 ESP Class Session, September 22, 1970 Rachel love remarriage Ned reawakened
ECS1 ESP Class Session, September 16, 1969 Matt Areofranz Mimi Rachel palm
ECS2 ESP Class Session, October 27, 1970 Florence puzzle leash degradation segment
ECS3 ESP Class Session, January 12, 1971 Joel Daniel violent Ned wring