our

1 result for (book:deavf2 AND session:912 AND stemmed:our)

DEaVF2 Chapter 7: Session 912, April 30, 1980 4/48 (8%) genetic triggering Rembrandt conceptualize fetus
– Dreams, "Evolution", and Value Fulfillment: Volume Two
– © 2012 Laurel Davies-Butts
– Chapter 7: Genetics and Reincarnation. Gifts and “Liabilities.” The Vast Sweep of the Genetic and Reincarnational Scales. The Gifted and the Handicapped
– Session 912, April 30, 1980 9:04 P.M. Wednesday

[... 1 paragraph ...]

The last evening of the month was quite warm for our area at this time of year66 degrees—and we had front and kitchen windows of the hill house open so the cats could go out on the porches as they pleased. Incredible, Jane and I thought, that 1980 was already four months old. Many of the birds have returned. I’ve started mowing a little grass each day.)

[... 22 paragraphs ...]

Again, such times are closely bound with reincarnational intents that direct the genetic triggering, and that meet in the culture the further stimulus that may be required. The time of the great masters in the fields of painting and sculpture is a case in point (humorously and louder)—so you see, I am getting to one of your favorite questions,2 and we will continue the discussion at our next session.

[... 17 paragraphs ...]

2. Seth referred to a question I periodically ask Jane, but seldom discuss with others simply because they don’t seem to be interested: What’s happened to all of the Rembrandts? Why isn’t there at least one artist in all of the world painting today whose ability equals Rembrandt’s, and who uses that great gift to evoke the depths of compassion for the human condition as Rembrandt did? For in my opinion there isn’t such a one around. By extension, why isn’t there a Rubens or a Velázquez or a Vermeer operating now? My choices are personally arbitrary, of course—yet why don’t we have a Rembrandt contributing to our current reality? Just those four artists, whose lives spanned a period of only 98 years (from 1577 to 1675), explored human insight in powerful ways. To link the “great masters” with our species’ reincarnational intents and drives, as Seth mentions in this session, opens up a new field for understanding my question, and a very large and intriguing one indeed.

Our many excellent “modern” painters inevitably work within a different world ambience. Our species’ art is just no longer the same—a fact I both applaud and mourn. However, I do feel that in the course of ordinary time we have either lost certain qualities of art or no longer stress them.

[... 3 paragraphs ...]

Similar sessions

DEaVF1 Chapter 6: Session 907, April 14, 1980 genetic determinism artist volition actor
DEaVF2 Chapter 7: Session 910, April 23, 1980 genetic mice thymus research idiots
DEaVF2 Chapter 7: Session 911, April 28, 1980 genetic Iran rescue defective hostages
WTH Part Two: Chapter 12: June 15, 1984 fetuses offspring cart born deficient