1 result for (book:deavf1 AND session:881 AND stemmed:jane)
(Saturday afternoon Jane finished typing the final version of her Introduction for Mass Events, and yesterday morning I mailed it to Tam Mossman at Prentice-Hall.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
I especially liked the first sentence Seth offered for his latest book. He promised something Jane and I could really focus upon … an exciting yet thoughtful time of “work” and new information. Quietly, with many pauses, a few of which are indicated:)
[... 4 paragraphs ...]
As most of my readers know, I make no claims of now having a physical personhood. (Pause.) I do claim an independent reality at another level of existence. My status and origins seem strange only because you have understood so little about your own origins. I am beginning this book this evening. I have already given the title, and at another level of consciousness Jane Roberts was able (12 days ago, for example) to perceive some glimpses of some of the subject matter that will be included here. So far, however, physically there is only the page of paper upon which Robert Butts is writing down these words I speak.
[... 1 paragraph ...]
I speak through Ruburt—or through Jane Roberts, if you prefer. Ruburt has his own creative abilities, and uses them well, and it is to a large extent because of those abilities that our contact first took place (in December 1963). Scientists like to say that if you look outward at the universe, you look backward in time. That statement is only partially true. When you move inward through the psyche, however, you do begin to thrust, in your terms, “backward” toward the origins of existence. Your creative abilities do not simply allow you to paint pictures, to tell or write stories, to create sculpture or architecture. They do not simply provide you with a basis for your religions, sciences, and civilizations. They are your contact with the source of existence itself.
(Jane took a long pause in trance at 9:10.) Give us a moment…. (Long pause.) They provide the power that allows you to form a belief system to begin with.
[... 14 paragraphs ...]
(After giving a little information for Jane,2 Seth wound up the session:)
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
(9:56 P.M. “I could feel him around when I was doing the supper dishes,” Jane said as soon as she was out of trance. “And I could feel him around more and more after that, but I still get cold feet when I know he’s going to start a new book…. Was it good?”
[... 1 paragraph ...]
“Well, I don’t want to think about that. If I do, then I’ll start worrying about my responsibility again and forget what Seth says about having the sessions because they’re fun. Wow—I’m really out of it. I’ll be curious as hell to read it,” Jane said as she headed for the couch.
“So,” I joked, “the day wasn’t a total waste after all. We did get something done.” Even Jane laughed.
[... 2 paragraphs ...]
1. Recently, I bought two books written by “scientific creationists.” The authors strongly disagree with ideas of evolution. I’ve read halfway through one of the books, and have discussed it with Jane to some extent. After the session I suggested that she start reading it also, in order to acquaint herself with theories radically different from the “ordinary” scientific ones espoused by evolutionists. Very briefly: The creationists believe that God created the universe (including the earth, obviously) around 10,000 years ago. They maintain that all of the earth’s living forms have remained essentially unchanged since that prime creative event; they can account for the disappearance of the dinosaurs, for example, and the vast number of other life forms we no longer see around us. On the other hand, evolutionary science believes that the universe came into being between 10 billion and 20 billion years ago; that the earth itself is about 4.6 billion years old, and that according to the fossil record and other evidence, its living organisms first arose and began evolving at least 3.5 billion years ago. Science also believes, however, that the study of a “first cause” involves not scientific but philosophical and theological questions. For instance, why did the universe we think we know so well come into existence at all, and what was the cause of that beginning?
I know that Jane is interested in the book in question, but also a bit afraid of it: “I don’t want to be so influenced by it—or by any other book—that it starts coming out in the material,” she’s said more than once recently. I agree, since I think that in their own ways the views expressed by the scientific creationists are just as limited as those held by the conventional scientific establishment. But Jane has an excellent critical mind. I’m not concerned that anything she reads will unduly influence her—or Seth.
[... 3 paragraphs ...]
“These sessions themselves involve the highest levels of creative productivity, at many levels, so he should refresh himself painting or doing whatever he likes, for that refreshment adds to his creativity, of course. He will finish his book (God of Jane), and do beautifully with it. He should follow the rhythms of his own creativity without being overly concerned with the time. For a while, again, have him write three hours of free writing, and paint or whatever. His book will be provided for. You can see how your own creativity is emerging in the notes for Mass Events. Granted, you need time to write physically, but the basic creativity has its own ‘time.’
[... 6 paragraphs ...]