“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Jane said she thought that right away Seth was starting to answer my question of yesterday — not the portion about radiation and why that phenomenon is too strong for us to bear, but the part about the consciousness embodied in cancer, say, which is also too much for us much of the time. [...]

[...] You are asking for answers that can only be found by going outside of the context of usual experience—for within that experience you are always led back to beginnings and endings, consecutive moments, and a world that seems to have within it no evidences of any other source.

[...] In a strange way, I’ve even become inhibited about asking him the direct questions I think I so much want the answers to. [...]

[...] These are indeed questions that I could answer for you, but again, I prefer that you establish this intimate working relationship with your own personal subconscious. [...]

[...] But here, check with me concerning the answers that you receive.

[...] Or is there such a variety of responses possible that you can’t answer the question simply? [...]

Well, a tidbit: It is a highly individual matter, so that an overall answer is difficult.

[...] Now during break, she used the pendulum to ask her subconscious a few questions about the cause of the swelling; the answers she obtained indicated the cause was psychosomatic, and that a salivary gland had been involved. [...]

It is much easier for me to deal with other people’s illnesses and health nuisances, than it is to deal with Ruburt’s. He asks me a question and then slams the ego gates down, refusing to hear the answer. [...]

[...] As a rule the answers are dependable, and this is all I will say.

“Seth answered each question I had the minute it came to mind,” he said. [...] He answered them in order.” He shook his head. [...]

[...] When Rob explained briefly about Seth before the session, he’d asked Mark questions he’d like answered. [...]

[...] “But the answers were just too specific, too on time, too direct. [...]

(I was greatly pleased that Seth answered one of my two questions, by saying that Jane did not have arthritis. [...]

[...] She finished at 2:55 while I answered some mail.

[...] Before the session I spoke aloud to Seth, asking him for straight answers to my questions about Jane’s symptoms lately. On June 5 I held a two-hour pendulum session of my own, concerning Jane’s symptoms, and received some revealing answers about the role I have played in them. [...]

[...] His material usually generates more questions than answers, but this time he’d outdone himself. I try to avoid reading too much into such brief passages, but I felt that if Seth answered all of the questions I could ask based upon this session, a book would result. [...]

[...] Even at the time I felt I wasn’t asking the right questions; sometimes the answers received were contradictory. [...]

[...] That is your answer—

[...] The answers are within you and even when I speak those words that I have spoken many times, they are simply words until from within you comes the experience that gives them life. [...]

Then, in your terms and in the way you are asking the question, the answer is that no, they should not and that they will have to deal with this. [...]

(This was the question I wanted answered more than any other.)

(I asked Jane to keep these questions in mind, perhaps to be answered by Seth later in the session: Was the survival personality aware of Jane? [...]

(I reminded Jane that one of the questions we had asked Seth to answer, earlier, still hadn’t been dealt with: Whether or not the woman Jane saw, as a survival personality, was aware of Jane.

(“I wish you hadn’t said that, Rob,” Jane answered, somewhat ruefully. [...]

[...] Seth answered:)

[...] However, at the time we still used the board to obtain answers to most of our questions. [...]

[...] It is then this inner self that must be searched for the answers. I mentioned earlier in another session that the very attempt to seek for an answer to the basic problem will indeed automatically release some of that energy for a constructive purpose.

(Seth answered my question by saying it was a good idea for Jane and me to attend the hypnosis symposium at Oswego next month, and to meet Dr. Instream, the director. [...]

[...] The answers, as you know, do not lie in drugs, although some, like your aspirin, may be helpful at times because of your belief in their worth. [...]

[...] Most of the private sessions we have in those 40 loose-leaf notebooks, about her symptoms, are the result of my pushing her for answers, not the other way around.

“Coincidence,” Gramacy answered dourly. [...]

[...] That answers that question very nicely. [...]