“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(I also reminded Jane that we hadn’t gotten an answer from Seth to my question about why all the fever business started right after Jane had put her Day 1, 2, 3 program into effect. [...]

[...] In the meantime, I am meditating and hoping that the answer will come.” [...]

(11:41.) Now—In answer to your question: of course you are both involved. [...]

Answering in multitudinous

From one end of reality you shout: “Where is God?” and from the other end the answer comes: “I am Me.” [...]

[...] I ended up asking Jane if she wanted to try free association after we’d talked a while, but got no definite answer.

[...] I still gratefully receive letters almost every day, and still struggle to answer each one in some fashion. [...]

(Assembling all of these elements into a psychological whole, he declared that “the sessions, among other things, were generated by your own experiences as creatures, and your desires to look for personal answers — but more basically, to seek out the answers [asked for] by all of your race.” [...]

The same applies on what you may think of as a more practical level, in that each day also holds within it the answers to current problems. [...]

Now: No matter what your current situation, the answers lie within your own aspirations and abilities. [...]

(We’ve also talked over Seth’s answer in the last session about why the subconscious doesn’t back off when it’s obvious that it’s gone too far in a protective role, say. I said that I understood his answer to my question all right, but yet that I felt there were still things there to be discussed; that in individual cases, for instance, the subconscious could go too far when there was no need to, and that in such cases it seemed to ignore the wishes and desires of the conscious personality involved. [...]

[...] Certain questions that you may have asked may be answered in such a state, but not in ways that you can anticipate, nor can you necessarily translate the answers into known terms. [...]

This session is dictation for the book — and in answer to your question at the same time. [...]

(11:49 P.M. By now it should be obvious that this session is an excellent example of the way Seth often winds our questions and concerns into book dictation, couching his answers so that they also fit the larger framework he has in mind. [...]

[...] She said Seth had felt no apparent urge to elaborate on any of his answers to my questions. [...] She said she sensed a slight irritation on Seth’s part when I asked if anybody else had listened to the tape with Dr. Instream; it was as though Seth could get the information to answer the question, but didn’t feel inclined to so exert himself.

[...] We made no connection here, but a legitimate one developed during the question-and-answer period.

[...] Both sections of this data are dealt with in answer to the first question.

[...] Later note by Jane: Unknown to us at this time I was to end up with another teaching position, in answer to an ad I had not yet read.

And when I do ask the questions, and I shall ask them, I shall expect some ready answers. [...]

[...] You would not feel the need to look for answers. [...]

[...] Their own fears trigger within themselves the answering release. [...]

[...] Again, such material often offends the intellect that demands simple, neat answers and descriptions that tally.

[...] I have every letter in the house answered. [...]

(In answer to a question from a student:) A beloved trap is one that you set for yourself. [...]

[...] It is not an answer in itself, but it can help in promoting relaxation momentarily.

Peg told me he was in his forties; he told her he’d written me but probably left before I could answer the letter. [...]