“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(No answer.) But you fell back each time.

[...] Do you want another question answered? [...]

Until this is realized your psychology will raise more questions than it answers. [...]

[...] If you have any questions however I shall be most delighted to answer them.

[...] Have I answered you sufficiently?

The usual answer, or the usual method of obtaining an answer, was at the time inconvenient: You were not about to get up, go outside and get the paper, so on its own the intellect pressed the magical-approach button, you might say, getting the information the quickest and easiest way possible.

[...] It was momentarily free of limiting beliefs, and it naturally used — and chose to use — the magical approach to answer what was a very simple, now-forgotten intellectual question: What might be in today’s newspaper?

[...] In their many forms religion and science haven’t provided satisfactory answers, nor have agnosticism or atheism. Why have so many human beings (an estimated 50 billion of them) had to exist along the way before we arrived at our present point—from which point we in our collective wisdom think we might begin to provide meaningful answers to such questions? [...]

[...] How would theology, or the sociology of science, answer any or all of these questions?

[...] The answers given by your pendulum also apply to my book, and to some (underlined) of our missed sessions in general. [...]

[...] While Jane left the room for a brief time, I asked my pendulum a question, and received this answer: “I don’t think Jane wants to get well.” [...]

[...] I believed the answer I had received, saying that the pendulum hadn’t steered me wrong yet on any major question. [...]

(However, I told her we might have to dispense with answering the mail if no other relief is obtained—anything to cut down on the feeling of responsibility. [...]

[...] It is enough to digest at one time, unless you have a question you particularly want answered this evening. [...]

[...] He wants his answers given to him in a way that his conscious mind can understand. This is our twenty-fourth session, and I am still trying to give you the answers.

[...] Was this an attempt at an answer?

[...] I remember thinking that no book of etiquette even written could give me an answer.

[...] Seth told Ann Diebler he could not at this time answer her questions concerning a friend in Newport News, Virginia, because he has not yet established an emotional rapport with her. He did willingly answer many other questions asked by Ann, Marilyn and Don, questions mostly based on the material itself and the concepts involved.

[...] A question-and-answer session. [...]

Now if you have any questions, you may take a brief break, and I will answer them, or you may end the session as you prefer.

The two of them don’t answer me. [...]

Jane nods and answers, ‘Yes.’

[...] Seth answered several in a class session held several days after Sue’s last dream. [...]

I write: ‘Do you breathe water somehow?’ She answers, ‘Yes. [...]

[...] There can also be a symbolic interpretation, and Seth raises this possibility in answer to the first question.

[...] We don’t know whether the following data is in answer to the question: “A designation of some sort. [...]

[...] Seth gets around to answering the question, but first inserts the material concerning my brother Loren: “Now, we will try something here. [...]

(Now Seth answered the question: “A rectangular object, with white background. [...]

[...] When finally I called on the speaker phone, the number rang four times by my count, and I began to wonder what we’d do if for some reason the police simply never answered. [...] When someone did answer, I explained the situation. [...]

[...] “I walked,” Fred answered. [...]

(After listening to me discuss the second question for a couple of minutes, Jane said she had an answer to it, or at least a partial one. [...]

[...] With Seth’s evident help, Jane herself began at least a partial answer — one that was cut off by our visitor, Barbara, pounding upon our door. [...]

If we’d encouraged him to begin answering question No. [...]

[...] I drank too much and I can’t let Seth speak in his own voice, to answer my questions.” [...]

I want to make this clear: no postulated new force theory will answer their questions until it is realized that no system is closed, and that the physical universe is not the origin of, but the result of, the energy that they seek. [...]

[...] When I asked the question about explaining a nonphysical life, Jane said she felt that Seth tried to switch to the other source or voice, after his own brief answer, so that we could get more data. [...]

[...] The news made us regretful in some way; it seemed to suggest answers to some of our own problems re living costs, locations, etc. [...]

You both do have an inclination to overstate your problems, and concentrate on them in an effort to solve them, and as you know that is not the answer. [...]

[...] And when it should be asked, “Who are you?” it would simply answer, “I am I,” and be answering for you also.

[...] This morning, we’d asked a series of pendulum questions about material in Monday’s session, concerning work, inspiration, protection, and so forth, and obtained some illuminating answers.

This is a partial answer to your question, voiced earlier. [...]

[...] She didn’t answer. [...]

(Jane didn’t answer. [...]

(To resume: Sue Mullin, now Sue Watkins, one of Jane’s ESP class members, left three questions last night for Seth to answer when possible. [...]

[...] I did remember Seth’s previous answer concerning the top question above, and it was to the effect that his experience with Jane and I is his first, at least on this plane. [...] I regret that I am unable to give the reader a page number for the previous answer. [...]

[...] And I have already upon one occasion answered your question. [...]

[...] Jimmy speculated that perhaps Marian had received a message from his father, in answer to his wish, even though he, Jimmy, had seen or heard nothing.