“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Male or female, the cat is now called Catherine, and answers to it. [...]

Surely you can find out the answer to this question for yourself.

[...] And reread this evening’s session several times, for you will discover that it answers several unspoken questions.

Now: in answer to, in partial answer to, your question concerning conscious knowledge of the body’s workings, I have several things to say.

Perhaps primarily the answer lies in the necessity that man recognize the spontaneous source of his being. [...]

[...] Coffee cake is no answer. [...]

(As I have said before, Seth has a way of answering questions that come up in conversation or even confirming or clarifying thoughts I have worked out for myself, without mention to anyone. A few of his following remarks apparently represent such “answers”.)

[...] Objective answers given to people are not true answers. Questions that help individuals search into their own experience can bring out answers that literally cannot be given. [...]

[...] There was no answer nor was there any answer when she called again shortly before 9 PM.

[...] This time Peg answered the phone, at 9:45 PM.

[...] Thus Leonard wrote his note in answer to a phone call by my mother at 10:05 Sunday morning, August 14. [...]

[...] (Pause.) This is in continued answer to your previous question.

[...] This is legitimate data and is explained when Seth answers the second question.

[...] Seth deals with it when he answers the first question.

One believes that the conscious mind and the intellect have all the answers, but to this school this means that the conscious mind is analytical above all, and that it can find all the answers through reason alone. The other school believes that the answers are in feelings and emotion. [...]

[...] Few studies have been done to discover why the happy man is happy, yet his answers would be highly pertinent.

[...] I answer mail PM.

Answer True or False:

(Humorously:) Is this because you know the answers, or cannot think of the questions?

(“Well, I don’t know the answers.” [...]

Then I will answer any questions that you have. [...]

[...] An individual might seek such a vantage point in order to look at the universe in a different fashion, asking questions that perhaps could not be answered if asked from any other position.

[...] “I think he was also answering some of the points that psychologist made in his letter,” she said. [...]

[...] After, however, she felt bodiless, changed position to answer my questions more clearly and get a larger view. She had no awareness of the room in which she sat giving the session, yet of course she did [or Seth did] hear my questions and answer them. [...]

[...] Some of you have written to tell of answers you have found, and some of you have written requesting answers. [...]

[...] This particular quality means that they resist forming any kind of organization, even though such an organization might help in answering the mail. [...]

[...] It will put you in touch with the ground of your being—from which, eventually, all exultation and answers spring. [...]

My purpose is not to come between you and your own freedom by giving you “answers,” even to the most tragic of problems. [...]

[...] Roger’s list contained a fourth question addressed to Seth; this one concerns the Bahai faith, was formulated by a girl friend of Pat’s, and will be answered by Seth at a later date.

[...] What followed was surprising to us in several ways, and raised many questions that we will now search out answers for.

[...] Jane said she could not make any conscious attempt to answer the questions, since she couldn’t read the formulas. [...]

[...] (Pause.) The answer then to one of your questions lies here.

(Jane received most of the above answer mentally, before the board spelled it out. She had also received some other answers in a like manner; and for the balance of the session she knew in advance many of the answers. Yet she did not hear Seth, or any other voice; as with the Thomas Voghler Ouija session, pages 186-7, the answers popped into her mind.

(And here again, Seth in the above paragraph immediately set about answering the questions that came to my mind.)

An art gallery did not have to be the answer, of course. [...]

(George Marshall gave a clear and lucid answer, but to my chagrin I cannot now recall the town’s name. [...]

[...] The answers to your problems lie within yourself and you can discover them—and in discovering them, you use your strength. [...]

[...] Is it a vehicle that will carry him back to your heart—ask yourself such a question honestly and look for your answers. [...]

[...] I will tell you, you will not find the answers you are seeking in any other way. [...]

[...] Are you (toBrad) going to cease looking for answers from the outside? [...]

[...] It is a good idea to read the questions before sessions, and when I have answers I will give them to you.

[...] This is in answer to one of your questions. [...]

[...] She smiled and several times attempted to answer my questions. [...]

You are, it seems, denied the easier satisfactions of accepted answers (pause), and to some extent denied the cozy comfort of shared beliefs. [...]

(Louder, and in answer to our talk earlier:) I am quite willing to hold as many sessions a week as suits your fancies. [...]

[...] The book is so written that as you read it you will pick up automatically those areas that most concern you, and even in the dream state follow through so that answers are going to appear consciously and visibly to you. [...]

Has that one been answered to your satisfaction?

[...] (Pause.) Science is used to asking quite specific questions, and as Ruburt wrote recently (in God of Jane) it usually comes up with very specific answers—even if those answers are wrong (with some humor).

“Wrong” answers can fit together, however, to present a perfect picture, an excellent construct of its own—and why not? For any answers that do not fit the construct are simply thrown away and never appear. [...]

[...] Moreover, science’s thesis meets with no answering affirmation in the human heart—and in fact arouses the deepest antipathy, for in his heart man well knows his own worth, and realizes that his own consciousness is no accident.⁵ The psyche, then, possesses within itself an inner affirmation, an affirmation that provides the impetus for physical emergence, an affirmation that keeps man from being completely blinded by his own mental edifices (all with much emphasis and fast delivery.